NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Refraction at the horizon.
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2008 Mar 16, 00:30 -0400
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2008 Mar 16, 00:30 -0400
Marcel, you wrote: "The practical problem is very likely that you don't have the atmospheric data from 50 to 150 miles out of to sea. When calculating refraction numerically one deals "generally" with an atmospheric model assuming that the atmosphere is horizontally homogeneous, i.e. an air layer at a certain height has everywhere the same temperature and pressure independent of the distance from the observer." I agree. This might be fun to explore. The standard approach to calculating refraction assumes no variation in the atmosphere in the horizontal direction. That is, the vertical temperature profile is the same at all points across the surface of the (spherical) Earth. However, it's not really a big deal to do a more sophisticated integration. Rather than working with an integration method like Auer-Standish, what's required is a complete ray-tracing system for a continuous medium. That would cover all possibilities. I wouldn't be at all surprised if there's software that does that already for purposes of digital landscape simulation. -FER --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---