Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Refraction
    From: Marcel Tschudin
    Date: 2005 Aug 26, 00:53 +0300

    The calculation of refraction really gripped you! Thank you for the (fast)
    transfer functions you provided. Before looking at them in detail, here some
    remarks and questions
    > There is  no sense in which these
    > modern refraction integrations are superior to earlier  ones. They are
    > somewhat
    > more flexible and they converge faster, but they can  cover the same
    > atmospheric complexity as earlier integrations.
    Thanks to Andrew Young (and to our postman), I have a copy of the paper
    "Sunset Science IV, Low-Altitude Refraction". One chapter of this paper
    deals with explanations of errors made previously, e.g. using Lambert's
    series expansion which is only semi convergent.
    The Auer Standish procedure is the prefered procedure; he indicates that
    this was already proposed by Bios in 1836 and then got forgotten. He
    therefore refers to it as the BAS procedure.
    > The difference  between the present
    > Nautical Almanac refraction table and the earlier one  apparently comes
    > down to a
    > rather slight difference in temperature structure in  the atmosphere.
    Does the Nautical Almanac have a different table than the previously
    mentioned table 6 from Pub. No. 249? If so, which title, page number etc.?
    Or, is there an other possibility to obtain it, instead of ordering it from
    "my" library abroad?
    > The pre-2004 refraction table can be derived (using the Standish
    > integration) from
    > an atmosphere model with a temperature lapse rate of 7.25  degrees C per
    > kilometer up to 11km and constant temperature above that. The  post-2004
    > refraction
    > table can be derived from an atmosphere model with a lapse  rate of 9.0
    > deg
    > C/km up to 2km and 6.5 deg C/km up to 13km and constant temp  above that
    > level.
    > These are both reasonable temperature curves which occur  somewhere on the
    > Earth every day. They are both "right" in that sense.
    Wouldn't it be possible to find the authors of the table and ask them which
    model they used und why? Or, are there some clarifying comments in the

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site