Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Refraction
    From: Gennaro Sammarco
    Date: 2005 Aug 4, 20:04 +0200
    Hi, here you can download the HO249
    Gennaro Sammarco
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 2:40 PM
    Subject: Re: Refraction

    Hello Robert


    Thank you for your fast reply. Unfortunately I am not in possession of the Air Almanac; in addition I am for about an other year abroad in a country where I am not able to order copies from a library. May I therefore ask you, whether it would be possible for you to derive from the table you indicated one or the other benchmark value? As you mentioned this would at least give a clue. Thanks a lot!


    Like you I am still hoping that there is some one out there who really can provide a solution to this problem.



    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Robert Eno
    Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 2:37 PM
    Subject: Re: Refraction

    Hello Marcel
    Refraction error makes the observed body appear to be higher than it actually is, ergo the same correction rules for postitive altitudes would apply to negative altitudes; only in this case the negative numbers would be added.  If, for example, your sextant altitude was minus 5 degrees, and the refraction correction was (I am just pulling a random number out of my head) minus 60 minutes (refraction correction is always subtracted from the sextant altitude), then your corrected altitude would be minus 6 degrees.
    Near as I can reckon, you would only experience negative altitudes from an aircraft flying at high altitudes or in the polar regions in winter.
    Have a look at Table # 6, HO 249, Sight Reduction Tables for Air Navigation and the correction tables at the back of the Air Almanac. These give you a bit of a clue as to what to expect. Other than these tables, I know of no other tables which provide refraction corrections for negative altitudes for observers at sea level.  If anyone out there is aware of such tables, do let me know. It is a question I have not pondered for some time now.
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 6:48 AM
    Subject: Refraction



    While searching with Google, I came across this mail list. May be some one out here may be able to help me answering the following question:


    How do refraction values for negative elevations have to be calculated, such as e.g. the horizon from a plane? (I am interested in the range of 0° to approx. –5°.)


    Is Bennett’s approximation also valid for negative elevations? If not, what other approximation formulae should be used, or, where can one find some benchmark values?


    I am interested in formulae for both, refraction from apparent position and from physical position.


    Thank you for any input to my problem.



    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site