Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Refraction - Corrigendum: Humidity
    From: Marcel Tschudin
    Date: 2005 Aug 27, 16:03 +0300

    The content of my previous mail needs a correction. The error is the result
    of a misunderstanding.
    
    > Here the influence of humidity on the refractive index of air in figures:
    >
    > This page from ESO describes the procedure on how the index can be
    > calculated:
    > http://www.ls.eso.org/lasilla/sciops/2p2/E2p2M/FEROS/Projects/ADC/references/refraction/
    >
    > The tabulated values on page 17 of the following manuscript from Stanford
    > correspond to the "dry part" of the index, as veryfied with the above
    > "procedure" for standard condition.
    > http://www.stanford.edu/group/efmh/FAMbook/Chap10.pdf
    >
    > Finally Andrew Young shows on his Web page the refractivity of air at
    > standard condition including the "wet part" as calculated by Peck and
    > Reeder
    > http://mintaka.sdsu.edu/GF/explain/optics/disp.html
    >
    > Now, what effect does this have on refraction?
    > Using 0? altitude at sea level (height=0m), standard temperrature (=15?C)
    > and pressure (=1013.25hPa)  and a wavelength of 595nm (orange, e.g.
    > sunrise or sunset).
    >
    > By integration over the light path:
    > Index with "dry part" only =1.000277  -> Refraction = 30.27 minutes
    > Index with "dry part" and "wet part" =1.000293  -> Refraction = 32.17
    > minutes
    > using a generally mentioned
    > approximative index of 1.0003 -> Refraction = 33.03 minutes
    > and, last but not least, Bennett's formula -> Refraction = 34.48 minutes
    
    The differences between the values shown in the Stanford document and those
    out of the graph on Andy Young's Web page are (mainly) due to different
    temperature scaling and NOT due to the influence of humidity. It seems that
    the values in the Stanford document are scaled to 15degC whereas the graph
    on Andy Young's Web page to 0degC.
    
    Marcel
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site