NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Reducing back sights
From: Jim Thompson
Date: 2004 Aug 11, 17:34 -0300
From: Jim Thompson
Date: 2004 Aug 11, 17:34 -0300
Thanks George, My question is theoretical, since I have only tried a backsight with a sextant (not octant) once, for fun, and then did not really understand what to do with the observation. Also I wanted to include more detail in my website at http://jimthompson.net/boating/CelestialNav/CelestNotes/SightReduction.htm#B ackSights , and a correspondent asked me via email to expand on the process. I was unable. I am interested in using a sextant for situation number 4: "At sea,He wishes to measure the altitude of a body above a horizon which is obscured by nearby land or by mist [or ships], though the horizon in the opposite direction is clear." Jim Thompson jim2@jimthompson.net www.jimthompson.net Outgoing mail scanned by Norton Antivirus ----------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: George Huxtable > A further question now arises: what does Jim Thompson wish to use > an octant > backsight FOR? I can think of four applications. > > 4. At sea,He wishes to measure the altitude of a body above a > horizon which > is obscured by nearby land or by mist, though the horizon in the opposite > direction is clear. > > In cases 1, 2, and 3, dip doesn't enter the question at all, > because angles > aren't being measured from the horizon. > > Whatever purpose he wishes to use the back-sight quadrant for, Jim has to > decide just how he is going to determine its index correction, on land or > at sea. Only then can we say how the observation should be reduced. > > Over to you, Jim.