Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Real accuracy of the method of lunar distances
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2004 Jan 16, 01:13 +0000

    Fred Hebard said-
    
    >It would seem then, that the altitude measurement (not especially its
    >accuracy, but the measurement itself) is a key component of the overall
    >determination of the cleared distance.
    
    Yes, indeed. (In certain circumstances, it's possible to calculate the
    altitude rather than measure it, but that's an additional complication that
    I suggest we avoid at present). And, of course, you measure the altitudes
    of BOTH bodies involved, though the Moon is by far the most important
    because of its large parallax. Then this allows for correction of the two
    refractions as well, not very significant compared with the parallax
    corrections, but it's still important to get them right.
    
    Because the amount of the Moon's parallax correction is about 1 deg x cos
    alt, then to achieve an accuracy of 1 arc-minute in the parallax correction
    only calls for an accuracy of 1 deg in the altitude in the worst case, so
    it's an undemanding observation. That is why I have presumed that any error
    in the parallax correction itself is quite negligible.
    
    >The cleared distance is a
    >function of _both_ the altitude and the observed distance.  In the
    >hypothetical case here, of completely stopped motion due to the earth
    >spinning twice as fast, it would be the magic ingredient that allows
    >one to map two identical observed distances to two different cleared
    >distances.
    
    You've got it!
    
    >I suppose right around meridian passage of the moon might be a bad time
    >to take a lunar, especially where it's altitude is about 90 degrees?
    
    Why do you say that, Fred? It isn't so, though it's what I have argued
    until the last few days. Although the AMOUNT of the parallax changes little
    around meridian passage of the Moon, the DIRECTION of the displacement of
    the Moon by parallax is changing very fast, and so, therefore, is the
    component, along the Moon's path, of the displacement between true and
    apparent Moons. The "clearing" procedure is clever enough to work all this
    out, and get from the uneven apparent motion to the regular true motion, at
    all altitudes of the Moon.
    
    George.
    
    ================================================================
    contact George Huxtable by email at george@huxtable.u-net.com, by phone at
    01865 820222 (from outside UK, +44 1865 820222), or by mail at 1 Sandy
    Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ================================================================
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site