Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Radium illumination
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2010 Sep 6, 19:38 +0100

    Gary Lapook never ceases to amaze me, with his throwaway lines, such as the
    latest- "Since I used to assemble nuclear weapons ..."
    
    Bit by bit, we have learned of his involvement with battle-tank artillery,
    with ferrying light aircraft across the Atlantic, with his later life as a
    lawyer specialising in aviation, and early life as a Chicago postman. What
    other surprises does he have in store for us? It makes my own life seem
    pretty humdrum.
    
    I suspect there are the makings of a good autobiography in all that.
    
    George.
    
    contact George Huxtable, at  george@hux.me.uk
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Gary LaPook" 
    To: 
    Sent: Monday, September 06, 2010 7:04 PM
    Subject: [NavList] Re: Radium illumination
    
    
    Since I used to assemble nuclear weapons I still have my dosimeters that
    measure the amount of radiation absorbed. I decided to see how much
    radiation was coming out of the A-7. I placed three different dosimeters
    with ranges of 0 to 200 milliroentgens, 0 to 1 roentgen and 0 to 200
    roentgens, since I didn't know what level of radiation to expect, into the
    box with the A-7. Twelve hours later the most sensitive dosimeter
    registered 70 milliroentgens which was confirmed by the second dosimeter
    showing something less than a tenth of a roentgen and the least sensitive
    dosimeter registered no change.This means that the rate is about 6
    milliroentgens per hour which would result in an exposure of about 50
    roentgens per year, about 250 times the normal background exposure!  Any
    exposure below 25 rems (approximately the same as a roentgen) produces no
    detectable clinical effects on humans so one could spend six months inside
    the sextant box without harm.
    
    But, of course, the dose rate is governed by the inverse square law meaning
    that the rate drops off based on the square of the distance. My dosimeters
    are about one inch from the bubble chamber but my TV watching couch is 15
    feet (180 inches) away from the bookcase where I keep the sextant. 180 ^2 =
    32,400 so the rate of radiation I receive from the sextant while sitting on
    my couch is only 0.185 microroentgens per hour, 1.6 milliroentgens per year
    above the normal background dose of about 200 milliroentgens per year. I
    guess that I won't loose a lot of sleep worrying about this.
    
    gl
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site