Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Questions
    From: Bruce Stark
    Date: 2002 Feb 28, 13:00 EST

    You've got a good grip on it, Arthur, and have laid things out clearly. The
    only thing that SHOULD make a difference between what you get with your
    method and with mine is the correction for temperature and pressure. I don't
    include that correction. As you've suggested, rounding error buildup could be
    a part of the difference. My method is designed to avoid such buildup as far
    as possible.
    
    Table 4, augmented semidiameter, is an example. The Almanac gives the moon's
    HP to the nearest 0.'1 every hour. The moon's SD has to be in the same ratio
    to HP as her diameter is to the earth's equatorial diameter: 0.2725. By using
    HP to inter table 4 you get SD to the nearest 0.'03, and get it for the hour,
    not just the day's average.
    
    Rather than have a separate table for augmentation, which would mean and
    extra step in the calculation, augmentation is built in to the values in
    table 4. As I expect you know, augmentation is zero when the moon's on the
    horizon, and 100% when she's overhead. It's a matter of distance. On the
    horizon you see her from the distance her center is from the center of the
    earth. Overhead you see her from that distance shortened by half the diameter
    of the earth, so she looks bigger.
    
    She looks bigger according to the ratio of her distance from the earth's
    center to her distance from the earth's surface. That ratio is the cosecant
    of her HP. You may want to make a sketch to see why. And in case you don't
    deal in cosecants, the ratio is the inverse of the sine of HP.
    
    As the moon rises from the horizon her augmentation increases as the sine of
    her altitude. So the formula I used to make table 4 is:
    
    (0.2725 HP)/(1-sin HP sin altitude)
    
    In case that doesn't show up on your screen in understandable form, here it
    is in words: Take 0.2725 of HP and divide it by unity less the product of the
    sine of HP and the sine of altitude.
    
    As to where the greatest leverage for increasing accuracy is, it's in the
    reliable accuracy of your sextant and the skill you develop in using it. But
    among the lesser stuff what counts most is the semidiameters you apply to the
    distance.
    
    Hope this helps. I think George has answered your other questions.
    
    Bruce
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site