Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Quad regression for Lunar Distances?
    From: Lars Bergman
    Date: 2018 Nov 11, 13:58 -0800

    Frank, you wrote: "Angle is "size divided by distance". In succinct terms: θ = s/r. That relationship doesn't "calculate" the angle theta; it defines its meaning. Every angle is a ratio -- just a number. It has no units, no dimensions."

    Size must have some dimension, as have distance. Let's say we use meters. Divide meter by meter. This equals one. So the dimension is one. I am fully aware that "dimensionless" (dimension = 0 ??) is often used for this case, but a more correct expression is dimension = 1.

    Further, you wrote: "Radians are not anything at all except a name to tag on the end to avoid confusing readers without basic math insights."

    Radian is an "SI derived unit" for plane angle, so you should not discard it that easy. According to SI it has dimension = m/m = 1.

    But this discussion is somewhat off topic, owing to you I have realized how to pre-calculate the rate of change of the apparent lunar distance, where it all started! Thanks.


    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site