Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Quad regression for Lunar Distances?
    From: Lars Bergman
    Date: 2018 Nov 8, 02:13 -0800

    Sean wrote: 

    "You calculate the lunar distances for the time period in question or use a table of pre-calculated values."

    The problem is that the geocentric rate of change that you get from calculated lunar distances is generally not equal to the observed (i.e. measured by sextant) rate of change. This topic was discussed some fifteen years ago in this forum, I think it was this phenomena that was called "parallactic retardation". Is there any simple method to find the expected rate of change of your observed distances, without using the observed data?

    The geocentric rate of change is (was) easily found through the proportional logarithm shown alongside the lunar distance in the Nautical Almanac. But how translate that to the slope of my sextant readings?


    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site