NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Pub.229 GC-Calculation distance and course.
From: Hewitt Schlereth
Date: 2009 Dec 2, 14:56 -0400
From: Hewitt Schlereth
Date: 2009 Dec 2, 14:56 -0400
A tip o' the hat to that. Bless the gods for sines, cosines and calculators. Hewitt On 12/2/09, John Karlwrote: > > > As I read it, what Guus seems to be asking is how they got the > > additional .2' they added to the course from the AP (246.1�) to the > > course from the actual point of departure in Fremantle (246.3�). > > > > Hewitt > > > Yep, I think you're right. I hadn't paid any attention to parts (4) > to (6) below the example. > > Part (6) requires a triple interpolation of Z among dec, LHA, and > lat. I skipped the lat interpolation because the 32*03' departure lat > is so close to 32*. Then my double interpolation of Z for LHA and dec > gives me 66.25* rounding to the 66.3* on page XXI of H.O. 229. > > All this is pretty darn academic compared to actual practice at sea -- > at least in my experience. > > JK > > -- > NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc > Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com > To , email NavList+@fer3.com -- NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList+@fer3.com