NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Proportional logs, etc.
From: Jan Kalivoda
Date: 2004 Aug 26, 00:05 +0200
From: Jan Kalivoda
Date: 2004 Aug 26, 00:05 +0200
Yes, Henry, if you have computed the value 1' 30" for 30 degs yourself from the usual tables of the refraction and parallax and didn't taken it from some prepared table in your table set (as I supposed), this is a beautiful explanation. I have seen the term "PL" for other bases than 10800 secs, too. But not at the beginning of the 19th century and only in German, it's true. Hello, Bruce. Jan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Stark"To: Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 10:44 PM Subject: Re: Proportional logs, etc. Henry, I'm thinking the problem comes from using a slightly different value of refraction. A change of less than one second of arc in the refraction correction would change the PL enough to make your calculation agree with that table. There were a number of ways of calculating refraction, and tables didn't always agree precisely. So far as I know, the term "Proportioning Logs" was used only for the kind you are familiar with, though the idea was used with other intervals. Bruce -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 7.0.262 / Virus Database: 264.7.0 - Release Date: 24.8.2004