NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Proof of interaction between Polynesia and South America
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2007 Jun 7, 18:58 EDT
See what's free at AOL.com.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2007 Jun 7, 18:58 EDT
The article says:
"Alice Storey, the leader of an international research team that dated
and tested DNA in the leg bone, said yesterday that Polynesians must
have been exploring and colonising South America long before
Europeans."
"Alice Storey, the leader of an international research team that dated
and tested DNA in the leg bone, said yesterday that Polynesians must
have been exploring and colonising South America long before
Europeans."
Colonising??! At least one landing with at least one chicken does not a
colony make! This comment that the Polynesians were colonizing South America is
clearing taking things to extremes. I would not be shocked if further evidence
eventually turns up that shows a few Polynesian voyages reached the shores of
South America (surprised and intrigued, yes. not shocked). But clearly they had
no lasting impact. There are no Polynesian dialects spoken along the coast of
South America. There are no Polynesian cultural artifacts. It's quite different
from every other place where the Polynesians established themselves. We have
possible evidence here of exploration, maybe even trade, but it's only a chicken
bone. And until someone DOES find evidence of Polynesian cultural artifacts in
some sort of habitation setting, there are a great many models that fit the
evidence of a single bone... including, dare I say it, Gavin Menzies' goofy
story of a circum-navigating Chinese fleet (or several... he changes the story
frequently).
Additionally, I think poultry everywhere should be outraged at this clear
insult to their navigational skills. Who says they needed a human, Polynesian or
otherwise, to carry them to America.They may well have sailed their own avian
arks! I can see it now: the Chicken of the Sea...
It's interesting to note that the press accounts of this discovery all
say something like 'Polynesians beat Columbus to the Americas' with no mention
of any earlier contact --as if no one had ever heard of the Norse settlement at
L'Anse aux Meadows in Newfoundland which predates the aforementioned sea-going
chicken.
-FER
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
42.0N 87.7W, or 41.4N 72.1W.
www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars
See what's free at AOL.com.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
To , send email to NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---