Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Precomputing sextant observations at sea
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2014 Jan 29, 03:54 -0800
    Something I found very interesting about Chichester's methods was the way he plotted his measured wind drifts on three heading which then allowed him to determine the actual wind that the plane was encountering. More modern navigators plot a vector diagram on a piece of paper or on the wind side of their E-6B computer to do this but this is the only time I have seen the vector diagram drawn directly on the chart. People have commented how difficult it would have been for him to manipulate the Bygrave while flying the plane at the same time. I have flown the exact same kind of aircraft and it is twitchy, you have to control it at all times, most airplanes will fly hands-off for a while but not the Gypsy Moth biplane. As difficult as it might be to use the Bygrave I am amazed that he managed to do the chart work in the open cockpit of the twitchy plane.

    gl



    From: Francis Upchurch <francisupchurch@gmail.com>
    To: garylapook@pacbell.net
    Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:18 PM
    Subject: [NavList] Re: Precomputing sextant observations at sea


    Thanks Gary, yes I think I now understand how and why he did extra LOPs mid flight in addition to pre-flight pre-computed.. He needed more pre-computed LOPs for intermediate times like 0400GMT ?, some with new APs and therefore new Hcs via Bygrave?
    The 2 remaining questions from the original chart are therefore:
    1) how did he place his "square box fixes" along the new sun sight LOPs?
    2) how did he calculate that final compass bearing at the turn off point to Howe Is? His pencil markings (bottom left) give bearing 193.3degs resulting from calculation 180+24.3=204.3,-11(?variation 11E?)=193.3degs, presumably magnetic? Where does the 24.3 degs come from?(combination of deviation,drift etc?) I think the -11degs is 11E variation,.I thought the true bearing would have been Az(68degs) +90deg=158deg true.
    Anyways,fascinating stuff.
    For my planned trip, the easiest approach looks to be simple graphs Hp & Az v time as you outlined.Although a short trip, I need 3 rock hopping waypoints where I need to miss the rocks by a mile and turn course, so I recon at least 3 LOPS..I'll show you the plan nearer the time.thanks again.I'll do the odd running fix as well ,just for fun.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=126745


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site