Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Precise great-circle calculation
    From: George Huxtable
    Date: 2001 Nov 19, 12:42 AM

    I have renamed this thread from "Haversine formulae for Great Circles" to
    "Precise great-circle calculation", to avoid the dreaded word Haversine. I
    hope nobody objects.
    
    Chuck Taylor asks-
    
    >> Even with this high
    >> accuracy, distances of 0.1 nautical miles have started to go a bit
    >> inaccurate, and distances which should be .01 miles are calculated as zero.
    >> With a computer using single-precision, things would be a lot worse. So the
    >> problem Lu has raised is a real one, in these special circumstances of
    >> close approach.
    >
    >
    >Why would one be interested in great circle routes for such short distances?
    >Mercator Sailing or Mid-Latitude Sailing would seem much more applicable for
    >distances under, say, 60 nautical miles.
    >
    >Chuck Taylor
    >Everett, WA, USA
    
    =========================
    
    My reply-
    
    Over such short distances. it becomes a plane-sailing problem, where you
    can ignore any shortening of the length of a degree of longitude along the
    short path between the point of departure and the destination..
    
    If you were devising software for the internal workings of a GPS receiver
    (the example that Lu suggested) then you would want to use an expression
    for distance that worked in all cases. It would be inconvenient if you had
    to make a test first to decide which formula was going to be applicable.
    Much better is a one-size-fits-all expression that provides a seamless
    answer, wherever it is used. And it's not clear to me how such a test could
    me simply made, to cope with every possible circumstance.
    
    As an example, imagine yourself as a polar explorer, approaching one of the
    poles. Doubtless, you would nowadays use GPS rather than a theodolite, to
    establish whether you had got there. You would not be pleased if the
    internal software of your receiver was insufficiently robust to cope with
    that special situation (something that the maker of the equipment might
    find it hard to test in advance).
    
    It's simpler for everyone if a formula can be devised and accepted that can
    be used in all circumstances, everywhere. In these days of computers and
    calculators, it matters little that the formula is more complex. The
    computer can cope. For those that have to (or choose to) do their
    calculations longhand, the priorities are entirely different.
    
    George.
    
    ------------------------------
    
    george---.u-net.com
    George Huxtable, 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    Tel. 01865 820222 or (int.) +44 1865 820222.
    ------------------------------
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site