Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Practice CN on cruise ship
    From: Bruce Cutting
    Date: 2017 Oct 21, 19:51 -0600

    Frank - I'm interested in where the 3438 figure for using the sextant as a
    rangefinder comes from.
    
    > Rommel John Miller, you wrote:
    > "I am sure every steward knows where to find the answer."
    > Indeed. But do you trust the answer that they bring you? There's no
    > downside for that steward if the answer is just a guess. I certainly agree
    > that the captain of the vessel will provide a reliable answer if available
    > because captains take pride in their vessels, and numbers like this matter
    > --if the captain has time for such matters.
    > You added:
    > "Algebra and geometry can find the height of buildings with formulae,
    > therefore finding the answer can be had of your dip on the boat deck, one
    > might think"
    > Oh yes, there are lots of mathematically "clever" ways to do it. But in
    > the real world, where the Internet is close at hand (maybe *actually in
    > your hand*), it is generally easiest, most efficient, and most accurate to
    > locate a photo of the vessel and, based on its length, also acquired
    > online, measure the height of your observing location directly. If there
    > are no photos online, then take one yourself from a few vessel-lengths
    > away while in port.
    > For a mathematically clever method, drop a rock (the crew, and possibly
    > the Harbor Patrol, will be upset, but do it anyway). Time the fall of the
    > rock from your observing height until it hits the water to a fraction of a
    > second, perhaps using a video or audio recording feature on a smartphone
    > to get tenth-of-second accuracy. Take the number of seconds, multiply by
    > 4, and that gives the dip directly in minutes of arc. This works because
    > ballistic fall time and dip of the horizon are both proportional to the
    > square root of the height. Example: if a rock, or other small dense
    > object, takes 1.5 seconds to reach the water, then the dip is 6'. If it
    > takes 3.0 seconds, then the dip is 12'.
    > For another mathematically clever method, use your sextant as a range
    > finder. You need to calibrate this, but just once in the life of the
    > instrument. Then lean over the side of the vessel from your observing
    > height and look at the waterline beneath you, or look at some object, like
    > a buoy, in the water close to the vessel (I recommend you tie a lanyard to
    > your sextant before you lean over the side with it!). Line up the direct
    > and reflected images just as you would for an index correction with the
    > sea horizon and read off the angle. This will be an "off arc" angle
    > assuming the normal index error is zero. For a typical sextant,
    > specifically an Astra IIIB, the relationship will be:
    >   Height(in feet) = 750 / angle(in minutes of arc).
    > So if the "index error"-like angle of the waterline is, for example, 15
    > minutes of arc, then the height of eye is 50 feet. Note that you should
    > zero out the normal index error or correct for it as usual after you
    > measure the angle. This angle can be measured with decent accuracy, but
    > you should do the calculation for values +/- 0.5' just to be sure you
    > recognize the possible range. For this case of 15' observed, the height of
    > eye might be between 48 feet and 52 feet implying that the dip correction
    > could be 6.7 to 7.0 minutes of arc. Given other uncertainties, this is
    > really quite good and a useful measure of dip. Just don't drop your
    > sextant...
    > Frank Reed
    > PS: The number 750 in the range finder rule can be estimated for other
    > sextants by measuring the distance between the two lines of sight of the
    > instrument when it's set to zero. If that's three inches, let's say, then
    > you divide by 12 to convert to feet and multiply by 3438. The result, 860,
    > is the factor in the numerator of the rule. If the distance is 2.6 inches,
    > then you get the 750 factor for the Astra sextant. It's better to try it
    > out empirically by actual ranging measurements (a backyard activity), but
    > you can get a good approximation before you start by looking at the
    > distance between the lines of sight on the sextant.
    >
    > [plain text auto-generated]
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > NavList message boards and member settings: http://fer3.com/NavList
    > Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    > To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >
    > :
    > http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx/Practice-CN-cruise-ship-FrankReed-oct-2017-g40432
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site