Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Possible limitaion for lunar distance measurement
    From: Herbert Prinz
    Date: 2009 Mar 01, 16:40 -0500

    Dunthorne makes the simplifying assumption that the effect of parallaxe 
    is in the vertical towards the geographical zenith. Strictly, it is the 
    geocentric zenith that is at play. Of course, he is not the only one 
    amongst his contemporaries to take this practical approach, but in the 
    eyes of an astronomie professor editing a manual for the Reichs Marine 
    in 1906 this may be a serious flaw. I am only guessing here, because I 
    don't have the text of the 1906 edition. The 1854 edition, which is 
    online, goes at great length into the corresponding error analysis, but 
    it does not mention the 70d to 110d rule. I don't see where it comes from.
    
    Kent posted formulas no. 18 and no. 20. Indeed, no. 20 (which is just a 
    prosthaphaeretic transformation of no. 18) is underlying the so called 
    "improved Dunthorne" method used in "Tables Requisite..." from the 2nd 
    ed. onwards. To understand the criticism we would need to see the 
    proposed alternatives, i.e. no. 21 or 23.
    
    Herbert Prinz
    
    
    Wolfgang K�berer wrote:
    
    >Dear all,
    >I think Frank's response to Kent's post may be misleading:
    >
    >The passage quoted by Kent's colleague is taken out of: "Lehrbuch der
    >Navigation. Herausgegeben vom Reichs-Marine-Amt. Zweite umgearbeitete
    >Auflage. Zweiter Band. Berlin 1906". And the passage says (in English):
    >
    >"Regarding the application of these different formulae for deducing the true
    >distance the following holds true: Dunthorne's formula (18), or formula 20
    >deduced from it, can only be applied, if the distance is between 70d and
    >110d. Formulae 21 and 23, on the other hand, can be recommended in all cases
    >and are the only ones to be used beyond these limitations."
    >
    >That - to me - seem to be "reasons mathematical" not "practical". But I
    >leave this to the mathematical minds of this group, as I am more of a
    >historical bent, as you will remember.
    >
    >Wolfgang
    >  
    >
    
    
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site