Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Possible limitaion for lunar distance measurement
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2009 Mar 2, 12:49 -0800

    George wrote:
    "It's certainly the case, as Frank has frequently pointed out, that when the 
    lunar distance is near 90�, it's very insensitive to the details of the 
    correction."
    
    To elaborate on this, there are several things at work: 
    First, there's the simple practical point which I mentioned a few days ago. 
    Navigators seem to have preferred shooting Sun-Moon lunars, and that's most 
    convenient from an observational perspective when the Moon is close to 90 
    degrees elongation. 
    
    Second, there are shortcuts in some clearing methods that can be applied when 
    the distance is close to 90. When using one of the series methods, the 
    quadratic correction is proportional to cot(LD) so it can be ignored near 90 
    degrees (except in some methods, like Bowditch's principal method, where the 
    quadratic correction is rendered always positive by adding a constant at an 
    earlier step). This is not a significant savings in work since the quadratic 
    correction was usually just a simple table lookup.
    
    Third, as I discovered a few years ago and have mentioned many times since, 
    the clearing of lunar distances has a remarkable, and as I have said 
    "seemingly miraculous", freedom from errors in the Moon's altitude when the 
    distance is close to 90 degrees. If the observed lunar distance is between 85 
    and 95 degrees (and the objects aren't too low in the sky), the observed 
    altitude of the Moon can be wrong by a degree or more and it won't make any 
    difference. This makes the whole observation and calculation much more 
    convenient since it means a quick observed altitude for the Moon is 
    sufficient.
    
    Fourth, and almost certainly not relevant historically, it's possible to clear 
    lunars when the distance is close to 90 degrees (and over a rather broad 
    range around that) without solving any spherical triangles at all. Any 
    observation can be reduced to the geometrically "degenerate" case of 
    vertically aligned bodies when the measured lunar distance is around 90 
    degrees. That makes clearing lunars in many common practical cases a 
    relatively trivial project. Too bad they didn't know this two hundred years 
    ago!
    
    -FER
    
    
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site