NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Polaris SHA
From: Michael Dorl
Date: 2008 Sep 19, 07:13 -0500
From: Michael Dorl
Date: 2008 Sep 19, 07:13 -0500
> I did not expect SHA to vary so much and move up and down from year > beginning to year end. I regarded SHA as an angular distance from the first > point of Aires. While the reference point changes with precession, the > relationship to the reference point remains relatively constant noting the > change of relationships due to proper motion and shifts (relativity) from > the Earth moving at nominally 70,000 mph around the Sun and their > relationships to the celestial sphere you have mentioned in the past. > > If I read you correctly, any small changes in the relationships between the > stars (for many reasons) that might seem minor on a star ball or a > conceptual celestial sphere are magnified by the coordinate > construct/system. > > Does it make sense to think of it this way? Any point close to the coordinate system origin can experience large relative coordinate shifts when the origin is moved. Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---