NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Polar Possessions of the SU. was: Lunars with SNO-T
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Oct 24, 15:21 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Oct 24, 15:21 -0500
Bruce, you are probably right! (I understood from the very beginning that the "lunars conjecture" was not plausible:-). But maybe not land-based (which can be done with a more precise instrument, theodolite), but ICE-BASED. The Soviets were always very much involved in Arctic activities. They really used commercially the Northern Sea Way as a way to ship loads from European Russia to the Far East. This was always an enormous problem for Russia, to communicate with its Far East. The attempts to build a railroad were only partially successful. Even now they have essentially only one branch to Pacific (letting one train at a time) and this branch was built in 1890-s. Great investment in another branch in 1970-s was a faillure, if I understand correctly. So they were always interested in convoys, led by icebreakers, through the Northern Sea Way. They had the largest icebreakers fleet in the world, including several nuclear-powered ones. It was impossible to make the whole passage in "one navigation", that is in one summer. The ships of a convoy had to stop and spend winter somewhere, frozen into ice. Only once they claimed a "world record", when an icebreaker made it in one summer. In the World atlas, published in 1959 which I had in my childhood they even had the boundary of the Soviet union extended to the North Pole and enclosing 1/2 of the Arctic Ocean. This half of the ocean was oficially called "The Polar Possessions of the Soviet Union". The practice of claiming these "Polar Possessions" ended, if I understand correctly,shortly after the first US nuclear submarine "Nautilus" made a trip to the North Pole under ice:-) Which happened in the end of 1950-s, if I remember correctly. On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Bruce Stark wrote: > I'm wondering if, for some reason, they had land-based > observations in mind. >