Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Pointless? Optimisation - Intercept Plotting
    From: Michael Bradley
    Date: 2019 Feb 2, 02:27 -0800

    Hi Brad

    Thanks for your comments

    You wrote:

    "Do I have your method properly laid out?  I understand using the lines at the "bow" to measure your T/A distance.  That is pretty clever and represents an interesting shortcut.

    Yes that's the idea
    There is a dilemma for me at step 4 however.  I cannot understand how you keep the angular orientation of the bow of the protractor constant while "shimmying" it about. A small angular error can yield a large error in fix, if the angle between intercepts is small.
    One way to maintain angle would be to set parallel rules across the bow of the protractor.  Then pin one side of the parallel rules, moving the other side, such that the intercept distance is indicated by your "bow lines".  It uses every part of what you have suggested, but maintains the angle!
    If you wish, why not?, and the parallel rules could also be set along the side of the rectngular Breton type protractor for the same purpose 
    Still no extraneous marks.  Still no divider pin pricks. " 
    The shimmying about is only what you always do with a Breton type plotter, because it has for the purpose the multi rectangular alignment grid within its compass rose, used for aligning the plotter in all forms of navigational bearing measurement and plotting. No difference in plotting accuracy there.
    I bought and marked up a cheap and cheerful Weems and Plath Compact Parallel (roller type) Plotter 060 and added the lines added to its 'bow'. All good, but the +/- 90 degrees is done in the brain, and the brain also needs to sort out the Towards/Away matter.
    The Douglas type Protractor has been tried, but by its nature it has bearing markings on its edge which confuse matters, and in needs a copious supply of meridians which you don't get on a plotting sheet.
    What is going on with the scheme for the Breton type plotter is that the markings work well for Towards intercepts, and the procedure for 'turning the plotter upside down' converts an 'Away' into a 'Towards' on the reciprocal bearing without any brain work.
    Good navigating
    Michael
       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site