NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Plastic sextants. was: GPS shortcomings.
From: Dave Weilacher
Date: 2005 Jun 9, 16:49 -0400
From: Dave Weilacher
Date: 2005 Jun 9, 16:49 -0400
A retired US Navy Commander friend who was reponsible for navigation aboard ship on one of his assignments is of the opinion that the horizon is always suspect near shore. The argument is that the differences in temperature between land and sea screws up the horizon that you see. Could this account for the discrepancy between every ones expectations and his measured results? -----Original Message----- From: Carl HerzogSent: Jun 9, 2005 4:26 PM To: NAVIGATION-L@LISTSERV.WEBKAHUNA.COM Subject: Re: Plastic sextants. was: GPS shortcomings. George Huxtable wrote: >I'm rather surprised that John Kabel experienced such large errors, when >using his Astra from a beach (about 50 % within 3 miles). Was this >shot-to-shot scatter? How repeatable was a series of repeated shots at >close intervals? It could be explained by days of anomalous dip, but a 50% >frequency seems absurdly high. Does John have an explanation? > I'm curious too. Results like that do not reflect the inherent capability of the sextants. I've never had results that bad with either a plastic Davis or a metal Astra underway on any size vessel. I've never tried shooting anything from the shore, so I don't know what other factors may confound accuracy there, but it seems like something else is wrong in this case. Carl Dave Weilacher .IBM AS400 RPG contract programmer .USCG Master lic. 100 ton .ASA Sailing Instructor Evaluator