Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Personal equation in timed observations
    From: Brad Morris
    Date: 2018 Oct 23, 11:37 -0400
    Fascinating!  Despite the best efforts of all involved, a systemic per observer effect remained.  Particularly interesting was the affect of declination on the observation by the so called anticipators.

    Such a systemic error will spill over into other facets of CN.  Is the star really grazing just the limb, or does the observer expect it to be a pinch more occluded?  Is that planet really grazing the horizon, or does the observer expect more light to be observed?  Did the declination of the star affect the method of sextant rocking, forcing an induced error.

    Does the presence of systemic errors preclude the use of the symmedian point (which demands no systemic errors)?  Does it affect the probabilistic evaluation of the cocked hat?  

    The counterpoint argument will be:  I know my personal error, and can thus account for it.  In light of the affect of declination, can the counterpoint argument be sustained?  

    Brad


    On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 11:09 AM Paul Hirose <NoReply_Hirose@fer3.com> wrote:

    In 1945 Popular Astronomy magazine ran a three-part series by Raynor L.
    Duncombe on the history of the "personal equation" in observations with
    transit instruments. He begins with the case of the Greenwich
    Observatory assistant who persistently observed meridian transits .5 to
    .8 second late relative to Maskelyne, who fired the man in 1796 for his
    "vicious" habit.
    
    However, by the early 19th century there was growing awareness of
    systematic individual differences in "eye and ear" transit timings by
    experienced observers. (The observer listens to the ticks of the clock
    and keeps mental count of the seconds while watching the star cross the
    vertical wire of the telescope.) For instance, a series of tests showed
    a 0.8 to 1.0 second offset in the transit timings of eminent astronomers
    Bessel and Struve.
    
    Development of the electrical art gave an alternative to eye and ear:
    the recording chronograph, in which a pen traced a helical path on
    paper, wrapped around a cylinder and rotated at constant speed. An
    electromagnet wired to contacts in a clock deflected the pen once per
    second. It also recorded the observer's tap on an electrical key at the
    moment of transit.
    
    This was an improvement. Early tests of personal equation were purely
    relative: one man with respect to another. But now absolute measurements
    were possible, via an apparatus which drove an artificial star across
    the field of view and recorded the true crossing of the central wire vs.
    the observer's key tap. Thus each observer's work could be made free of
    his personal equation.
    
    At least, that was the theory. But the growing body of chronograph data
    began to show a systematic error as a function of declination in the
    work of some observers, but not others. The fault lay in the lack of
    standardization in the tapping technique. Some observers were proactive
    — they thought it proper to anticipate the instant of transit and begin
    the muscular impulse early so the tap occurred exactly on the wire.
    Others were reactive. They waited until the star was on the wire, then
    tapped. Of course this tap was always late, but reaction time would be
    included in that observer's personal equation.
    
    It turned out the latter gave more consistent results. Proactive tappers
    had a tendency to develop a timing optimized for one particular
    declination. At any other declination the star would move at a different
    rate, and despite the observer's best effort the tap would be early or late.
    
    The next weapon against personal equation was the impersonal Repsold
    micrometer. In this the wire was movable, driven by a screw operated by
    the observer, who tracked the star continuously. A disc with electrical
    contacts was attached to the screw. This transmitted pulses to the
    chronograph. In some cases a motor rotated the screw, and the observer
    controlled its rate.
    
    With this device the transit instrument attained unprecedented accuracy.
    In fact, even recent JPL ephemerides depend in part on transit
    observations of the outer planets as far back as 1911. (This coincides
    with the introduction of the impersonal micrometer at the USNO.)
    
    Nevertheless, eye and ear is still the way we check a clock with a
    shortwave radio. When I find a time page on the Web dead accurate (or
    not) with respect to ticks from my radio, I wonder how much personal
    equation is present. Some of the values measured in the heyday of eye
    and ear are almost unbelievably large.
    
    http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1945PA.....53....2D&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES
    
    http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1945PA.....53...63D&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&plate_select=NO&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_GIF&classic=YES
    
    http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1945PA.....53..110D&db_key=AST&page_ind=0&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_VIEW&classic=YES
    

    View and reply to this message

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site