Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Paper by Bill and Merri Carter
    From: John Huth
    Date: 2010 Nov 24, 11:54 -0500
    Yes, I regret paying the 30 pounds for the dang thing.   It's mainly griping at Dana Sobel, and doesn't have a lot to back it up.   Mainly it's things that most people would know, and as someone pointed out - power didn't keep the Titanic from sinking.   I expect we could come of with a few other examples.   What as the name of the one that got grounded off of Nantucket?

    On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:44 PM, George Huxtable <george@hux.me.uk> wrote:
    Richard Langley brought attention to the following abstract of a paper in
    the latest issue of The Journal of Navigation.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Richard B. Langley" <lang@unb.ca>
    To: <NavList@fer3.com>
    Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 7:12 PM
    Subject: [NavList] Paper by Bill and Merri Carter

    RIN members might want to be on the lookout for a paper in the latest issue
    of The Journal of Navigation:


    Title and abstract:
    The Age of Sail: A Time when the Fortunes of Nations and Lives of  Seamen
    Literally Turned with the Winds Their Ships Encountered at Sea

    This paper examines the evidence to support the view that the inability of
    seamen to determine accurate longitude at sea in sailing ships was a major
    factor in the loss of ships and crews that was effectively solved by the
    introduction of the marine chronometer. It concludes that this was not the
    case and that a more compelling factor for the safety of ships was the
    introduction of mechanical propulsion systems.

    -- Richard Langley


    From that, I deduce that Richard has read the abstract, but not the paper
    itself, though he doesn't say so.

    Frank Reed followed that with another posting on the same subject, from
    which I deduce that he has not read the paper either, but he doesn't say

    I have read it, and subsequently had quite a bit of correspondence with one
    of the authors, Bill Carter.

    My advice to Navlist members is that the should not bother with this paper,
    which does not fulfil the promise of its abstract. If anyone would like to
    discuss it in more detail, I would be quite happy to take it further, but
    otherwise it does not seem to me to be worth the expenditure of digital


    contact George Huxtable, at  george@hux.me.uk
    or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.

    Keeping up with the grind
    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site