Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Old style lunar (in expert hands)
    From: Kieran Kelly
    Date: 2004 Dec 10, 22:44 +1100

    Fred Hebard wrote in relation to the Australian explorer Augustus Gregory
    
    "Also, perhaps Thompson was not the best of lunarians.  Kieran Kelly
    last year or so posted a series of lunar observations taken by an
    Australian explorer that were exquisite.  I can't imagine that the
    distance cleared from those would have been in error by more than 0.1
    or 0.2' of arc, given an accurate sextant."
    And
    "Augustus Gregory. This was about 50-60 years after Thompson. I don't think
    sextants improved much in the intervening period but the quality of lunar
    predictions probably did. It could be that Gregory was just that much
    better than Thompson. Thompson was blind in one eye but I don't know if
    the vision in his other eye was impaired in any way."
    I agree with Fred's comments and have been following this topic with
    interest. If any other list members would like to examine the paper he
    mentioned it can be found at:
    http://www.ld-DEADLINK-com/
    As I have pointed out many times before on this list, land navigators were
    sometimes expert lunarians and developed their own methodologies and
    techniques. I have led four expeditions in outback Australia relying on maps
    produced by Gregory 150 years ago using longitudes derived from lunars. He
    shot both the lunar distance and the altitudes of the bodies in the same
    process. Unlike L & C he sat down and worked lunars out in the field.
    To anyone interested in 19c technique I urge you to read the Gregory paper.
    Also on this topic Frank  Reed wrote: "But something that might not be so
    obvious is that dead reckoning is simpler at sea since it consisted of long
    legs on constant headings. At least there aren't any currents on land!"
    I have used both horses and camels in desert conditions without landmarks
    following a compass bearing. Dead reckoning is easy under these conditions
    because:
    1) There is no set or drift - it is easy to steer the animals in a straight
    line.
    2) All pack and riding animals when organised in a "string" walk single file
    in a straight line behind each other
    3) All walk at a remarkably constant speed. Camels 4km/5km per hour
    depending on ground, heat and scrub ditto for horses except they walk about
    6km per hour. Well handled the animals will maintain these paces/speeds day
    in and day out.
    After a 30 km march in desert country using a compass, I am very
    disappointed if I am out by more than 1km (6/10 mile) at the evening camp
    (checked using GPS).
    Kieran Kelly
    Sydney
    Australia
    
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site