Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Old style lunar
    From: Ken Muldrew
    Date: 2004 Dec 16, 10:15 -0700

    On 16 Dec 2004 at 9:50, Alexandre Eremenko wrote:
    > Anyway, it is interesting to know where the advise
    > "not to measure altitudes" comes from and what was
    > the justification.
    This is an interesting question and one that has been discussed here
    before (though I don't recall if anyone was able to answer it
    satisfactorily). Thompson was instructed in celestial navigation by Philip
    Turnor who was one of Maskelyne's computers for the nautical almanac. It
    is hard to believe that Turnor wasn't aware of the standards of practice
    advocated by the cognescenti.
    I just briefly flipped through one of Peter Fidler's notebooks and out of
    25 lunars, there wasn't a single instance of an altitude exceeding 55?. So
    the idea that an artificial horizon would limit the number of altitudes
    that could be taken seems to be without merit (at least for this
    latitude). Did the inherent error of the moon's position, and the
    resulting uncertainty of any lunar, lead people to decide that measuring
    altitudes just wasn't worthwhile?
    Ken Muldrew.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site