Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Old style lunar
    From: Ken Muldrew
    Date: 2004 Dec 9, 16:36 -0700

    On 9 Dec 2004 at 17:41, Alexandre Eremenko wrote:
    > But the standard deviation of longitude is 0.3 deg,
    > that is 20' which probably better describes his accuracy
    Don't forget that his lunar position depends on a time-sight measurement
    as well as the lunar distance. His watch was often out by more than 10
    minutes each day, and the direction of error was unpredictable, so he was
    entirely dependent on the time sight. Any error there would propagate into
    the lunar error.
    > But this is probably easy to check. If anyone has a 1800
    > (or around) almanach. Just compare it with Frank's online
    > lunar dist predictor. As I understand it gives accurate results
    > for the XIX century.
    Bruce Stark was kind enough to send me some pages from the 1800 almanac
    this past summer. Perhaps I can check a few entries to see what Thompson
    was up against.
    Ken Muldrew.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site