NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Old style lunar
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2004 Dec 10, 15:50 EST
From: Frank Reed CT
Date: 2004 Dec 10, 15:50 EST
I wrote earlier:
>It's no longer necessary to do this algorithmically. Just open a
virtual
>almanac page.
>almanac page.
George H asked:
"What about if you need those predictions when you're at sea? I ask."
"What about if you need those predictions when you're at sea? I ask."
Since we're comparing Meeus algorithms with a straight database based on
JPL integrations, I assume that a computing device is permitted. The software
and data to do this by database for a year is approximately the same
size as the software to do it algorithmically, and it is many times more
accurate for the Moon's position. For longer stretches of time, the database
grows in size linearly. Many people approaching this problem look at the
original JPL database which is hundreds of megabytes for a century of data and
assume that that's too big to be practical. But there are a variety of
straight-forward techniques that can reduce the size to ten megabytes for 300
years. That's the whole size (ten megs) of the database behind my online
300-year almanac and lunar distance predictor. The code to access it is just a
couple of hundred kilobytes.
Believe me, I used to be quite fanatic about algorithmic approaches a la
Meeus, Chapront-Touze etc. Then I realized that the whole approach was absurd
for the vast majority of "practical" applications. The positions of the planets
have *already* been calculated using numerical integrations that include such
tiny factors as the gravitational perturbations induced by the largest
asteroids. The almanac exists. We don't need to re-calculate it every time we
want the position of the Moon.
Frank R
[ ] Mystic, Connecticut
[X] Chicago, Illinois
[ ] Mystic, Connecticut
[X] Chicago, Illinois