Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Old style lunar
    From: Frank Reed CT
    Date: 2004 Dec 9, 16:06 EST
    Ken M wrote:
    "You can see that the spread of lunars covers a full degree but his final
    position was pretty close."
    It might be interesting to find out how much error there was in the almanac data for those dates. Circa 1801, that was still a major source of error in longitudes derived from lunar distances.
    And wrote:
    "He took this latter step because he was intending to map
    everywhere he travelled, but he clearly put more faith in his celestial
    observations than did many of the ocean navigators that Frank has written
    Under good conditions, I think it goes without saying that lunars are more reliable when observed on land than at sea. The platform is stable. One can shoot dozens of lunars to make a set instead of a handful. You can wait for the weather to change. And so on... But something that might not be so obvious is that dead reckoning is simpler at sea since it consisted of long legs on constant headings. At least there aren't any currents on land!
    Frank R
    [ ] Mystic, Connecticut
    [X] Chicago, Illinois
    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site