
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Old Style Lunar
From: Ken Muldrew
Date: 2005 Jan 10, 11:01 -0700
From: Ken Muldrew
Date: 2005 Jan 10, 11:01 -0700
Before Christmas we were discussing some lunars shot by the Fur Trader David Thompson about 200 years ago and the accuracy that he was capable of obtaining. The discussion ended awaiting further analysis of the old almanacs to see if the poor lunar theory of those days was responsible for the large variation in Thompson's data. Bruce Stark kindly sent me the pages out of the old almanacs so that I could check. I have completed checking just the lunar distance to time part of his calculations, relying on Thompson's written longitudes as a check on my transcription (this is the toughest part of checking his lunars: I've assumed that if I can recapitulate Thompson's longitude by using his cleared distance and local time, with the old almanac, then I've properly read his text). Below is a list of Thompson's data from Rocky Mountain House. The column marked "Thompson" contains his original calculated longitudes and the column marked "corrected" has been recalculated using Frank Reed's online almanac. True position of Rocky Mnt. House 52?21'20"N 114?58'50"W Latitude Date Apr 09,1800 52?21'29" Feb 20,1801 52?21'27" Feb 21,1801 52?21'35" Mar 05,1801 52?21'32" -------- Average 52?21'30" Longitude Date Thompson Corrected Apr 17,1800 115?12'00" 115?18'20" Apr 18,1800 114?57'45" 115?01'58" Dec 22,1800 115?11'00" 115?29'44" Feb 17,1801 114?51'15" 115?14'02" Feb 17,1801 114?39'00" 115?04'17" Feb 24,1801 114?36'00" 114?57'01" Feb 24,1801 114?13'00" 114?38'09" Feb 25,1801 114?28'45" 114?52'06" Feb 25,1801 114?26'45" 114?48'33" Feb 28,1801 114?52'15" 115?04'48" Feb 28,1801 114?59'45" 114?57'54" Mar 01,1801 115?11'00" 115?14'32" Mar 18,1801 114?44'15" 114?59'10" --------- --------- Average 114?47'38" 115?02'50" The corrected values reduce the spread somewhat, bringing his standard deviation down from about 20' to about 14', but he's not in the class of lunarians like Augustus Gregory. I'm still going through the process of checking all of Thompson's calculations to see if any errors like the one we found in his Nov. 26, 1800 lunar (discussed in the Old Style Lunar thread in December) figure in Thompson's results. This is slow going but perhaps I'll put all the calculations up on a web page when I'm finished in case anyone is interested. Ken Muldrew.