NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Octant as dipmeter
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Nov 20, 10:21 -0500
From: Alexandre Eremenko
Date: 2004 Nov 20, 10:21 -0500
Dear George, On your request, I include a complete citation of the relevant place in Norie (he refers to notation on the picture of the quadrant that you see): IV. To set the Back Horizon Glass perpendicular to the Plane of the Index Glass, 0 on the Nonius being at 0 on the Arch. Let the 0 on the Nonius be put as much to the right of 0 on the Arch as twice the dip (taken from Table V.) amounts to: hold the Quadrant in a vertical position, and apply the eye to the back Sight Vane L; then if the reflected Horizon, which will appear inverted or upside down, coincide with that seen direct, the glass is adjusted; otherwise the screw in the middle of the lever on the under side of the Quadrant must be slackened, and the nut at its extremity turned till both horizons coincide. My comments. 1. How the back sights are taken in general. Suppose the quadrant is oriented like on Norie's picture. You hold it with your left hand by the frame, using your right hand to move the arm, and look through the sighting vane L at the mirror H. This mirror has a slit that permits you to see the Horizon in front of you directly (you are looking horizointally left to right with respect to the Norie's picture). The celestial body behind you is reflected in the index mirror F first, then the reflected ray goes to the mirror H and reflected to your eye through the Vane L. Almost as in the usual sextant, except that the index mirror "looks back". 2. Now, setting the arm near zero, you see the horizon behind you through two mirrors, and the horizon in front of you directly through the slit in H. And the sextant measures twice the angle between the directions at these two horizons; exactly what a dipmeter is expected to do. On your question, how to determine index error of the Back sights, one answer is to take known star-to-star distances. On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, George Huxtable wrote: > On my screen there's no such box or such an option to click on. > Instead, I > get a nice engraving of the Hadley quadrant, etc., > but otherwise am stuck > within the 8 pages of the preface, with no apparent means of escape. Try entering this URL: http://www.mysticseaport.org/library/initiative/ ImPage.cfm?BibID=13617&ChapterId=25 This brings to directly to the beginning of the chapter on Hadley quadrant, what I cited is on p. 6 of this chapter. > I suspect that for most modern sextants there > is insufficient headroom even > for that. My further experiments show that it could be "just enough". The extra mirror has to be attached near the very left end of the arc. And of course, the mirror frame can be designed so that it extends the sextant frame a little bit down. Of course I have no intention to drill a hole in the frame of my cherished SNO-T (not speaking of my forhead), but sometimes I can buy a plastic sextant or an old SNO-M for such experiments, by the way the frame of Davis Mk 15 sold by Celestaire is by 16 mm larger than that of the modern metal sextants. Alex.