NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
R: Re: Ocean Yachtmaster Exercises
From: Federico Rossi
Date: 2008 Aug 15, 09:38 +0200
From: Federico Rossi
Date: 2008 Aug 15, 09:38 +0200
Henry, the exercise should have then named the index error negatively: if it adds 2'.0 to the sextant altitude then the index correction is +2'.0: the error thus must be -2'.0 which is off the arc: if it's on take it off, if it's off take it on. Federico -----Messaggio originale----- Da: NavList@fer3.com [mailto:NavList@fer3.com] Per conto di hch Inviato: venerd� 15 agosto 2008 5.29 A: NavList@fer3.com Oggetto: [NavList 6134] Re: Ocean Yachtmaster Exercises Frederico, If I understand your posting, the exercise is correct in naming an off the arc error positively as an off the arc error is applied additively (+), and an on the arc error, negatively (-). Just remember ... " if it's on, it's off (-), if it's off, it's on (+)" Happy correcting. Henry --- On Thu, 8/14/08, Federico Rossiwrote: > From: Federico Rossi > Subject: [NavList 6132] Ocean Yachtmaster Exercises > To: NavList@fer3.com > Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008, 5:17 PM > Hi, > > today I was working an ocean passage making exercise taken > from this book > (Ocean Yachtmaster Exercises published by Adlard Coles > Nautical - London) > and I was quite surprised by what seems a trivial error to > me, i.e. the > exercise states that index error is +2'.0. Isnt'it > on the arc? So the index > correction should be -2'.0. but the solution shows a > +2'.0 correction, and > the same happens for the following exercises. How is it > possible? > > Federico > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---