Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: (OFF-TOPIC) Flight 370
    From: Don Seltzer
    Date: 2014 Mar 26, 10:12 -0400
    Frank,

    I don't think that you can simply sum/difference the north/south speeds of the plane and the Inmarsat satellite.  The Doppler shift is dependent on relative motion toward/away from each other.  During the earlier portions of the flight after the last radar contact in the Straits of Malacca, flight 370 was almost due east of the satellite.  Any N/S motion of either body would be nearly tangential to the 'circle of distance rings', creating very little instantaneous difference in distance.  Only later in the flight, when the plane was possibly to the SW or NE, would this effect be noticeable.

    I will speculate that the analysts tried various straight line fits to the six or seven ping data that were collected, assuming that after the Straits the plane was set on autopilot with a fixed heading and speed.  They may have been looking for a course which intersected the half dozen circle of distance rings at the correct times, and exhibited Doppler shifts of the correct magnitude for the delta to the next ring.  For the SW path, the plane would be initially coming nearer to the satellite.  For the last few pings, the plane would be traveling more distant, eventually reaching the final, most distant ring reported to the media.

    The possible NW path is nearly, but not quite symmetrical with the first.  The asymmetry arises because the starting point in the Straits is north of the equator.  It could be that a straight course/constant speed hypothesis would not work in this direction.

    Don Seltzer


    On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Frank Reed <FrankReed@historicalatlas.com> wrote:

    Well, I wanted to comment on this last night, but I restrained myself, in order to follow my own advice and post just once a day on this topic. I do apologize in advance if this tries anyone's patience, but clearly there's still an enormous amount of interest in the mystery.

    We learned ten days ago from Inmarsat, which recorded simple "handshake" pings from the aircraft without positional information, that they were able to determine a rough "circle of position" for the aircraft at the last (or second-to-last?) ping that placed it either on a great arc extending across western China and maybe as far as Kirgizstan or on a southern arc extending deep into the southern Indian Ocean.

    The circles on the chart that was published by media sources are circles of equal angular altitude. But I think (and Peter Monta agrees; private discussion) that this is probably range data based on the round-trip speed-of-light travel time of the quick "handshake" conversation between the satellite, 23,000 miles out in space, and the hardware in the aircraft. They could thus determine the distance of the airplane from the satellite or equivalently from the spot near the equator on the Earth directly beneath the satellite. The satellite in question is Inmarsat 3-F1 (or Inmarsat III F-1, depending on the catalog) which hangs in geosynchronous orbit nearly above the equator south of India. The circles are concentric on that spot beneath it on the Earth's surface though the circles of "equal light travel time" would not be evenly spaced as in the published diagram (but close enough in the ranges in question).

    What other information could they get from those pings? How did they narrow things down? Articles published in the past few days refer to "Doppler effect" and make vague references to spooky "mathematics" --it's all "boffin" stuff, way beyond mere mortals. There's very little detail in the published reports, but it seems like there's a huge problem. The Doppler effect for a satellite in geosynchronous orbit would seem to be symmetrical. If the aircaft was on the northern arc and headed generally north, then it would be moving away from point on the equator at its cruising speed, maybe 600mph. If the aircraft was on the southern arc and headed generally south, then it would ALSO be moving away from a point on the equator at the same speed. So Doppler effect alone would not seem to help solve the problem.

    The key seems to be that Inmarsat 3-F1 is not exactly in an equatorial orbit.. It's inclined by 1.7° with respect to the equator. So that means that if you were standing on the equator directly under its mean position and you could see it with a telescope, you would observe that it shifts north and south of the equator (and also a little east and west but that doesn't matter here) moving north to a bit more than 1.7° Declination and then to the same Dec south of the celestial equator, completing a cycle in every 24-hour orbit. That means that the satellite is usually travelling north or south relative to an observer on or near the Earth's surface. Moving up and down a mere 1.7° of latitude in a 24-hour cycle may not sound like much, but this is all happening in an orbit with a radius of 23,000 miles. So the actual speed of the satellite relative to the Earth's surface can be as high as 180 mph (approximately) and on average it's about 100 mph. This is the north-south component of the speed. And of course, the orbit of the satellite is exactly determined and known so we know exactly how rapidly the satellite is moving in the north-south direction at any instant of time. I haven't checked details, but suppose for the sake of argument that the satellite is travelling southbound (on the descending branch of the orbit) at a speed of 150 mph at the time it receives a signal from an aircraft. If the aircraft is travelling mostly northbound at a speed of, let's say, 600 mph, then the relative speed between the two would be 750 mph. If the aircraft is instead travelling southbound, then the relative speed would be 450 mph. The Doppler shift at 750mph is obviously greater than the Doppler shift at 450mph. By comparing a series of pings (I think they have at least four that they trust) and getting estimated ranges and approximate speeds, it would be possible to definitively exclude one of the range arcs in the original circle of position. One direction could yield a consistent set of range and Doppler values. The other could not. That's my best guess as to how they were able to further analyze the signals and make the most recent determination that the aircraft must have ended up somewhere near 45°S and 90°E.

    -FER


    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    NavList message boards and member settings: www.fer3.com/NavList
    Members may optionally receive posts by email.
    To cancel email delivery, send a message to NoMail[at]fer3.com
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    View and reply to this message: http://fer3.com/arc/m2.aspx?i=127373


       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site