Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Noon (was Sexagesimal)
    From: Dan Allen
    Date: 2002 Feb 19, 11:22 -0800

    These are all just agreed upon conventions.  Some US government website
    I was at recently said that 12:00:00 AM (midnight) belongs to the day
    just starting, so a day ends at 11:59:59 PM, the second before midnight.
    Since the PM becomes AM at 12:00:00 AM (0000), then the corresponding
    flip from AM to PM occurs at 12:00:00 PM (1200).  So Noon is PM.
    Actually, the instant of noon of course is neither AM or PM because of
    the definitions:  Ante Meridian and Post Meridian, and Noon is Meridian
    Thinking about this reminds me of the "off-by-one" programming
    errors that cause us to always stop and think carefully when running
    through an array with an index...
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Navigation Mailing List
    Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:13 AM
    Subject: Re: Sexagesimal (was Newbie - Variation..)
    Hey, while we're at it, why don't we debate 0000 vs 2400?
    And, for a more esoteric question, does midnight belong to the earlier or
    later of the days it separates?
    But, wait, there's more!  Is noon 12AM or 12PM?  What about midnight?
    All but the first are very important to me in programming my VCR when I
    want to record a program starting at midnight.   Have not yet been able to
    fathom the mind of the Japanese VCR designer, so I just program the damn
    thing to start at 12:01 AM, on that there is at least universal agreement
    as to time and day. ;-)
    Lu Abel
    At 11:08 AM 2/17/2002 -0800, you wrote:
    >OK, Brian and Trevor, looks like we're going to have to bring in the Olympic
    >figure skating judges to sort this one out.  I'm learning so much from all
    >you guys, and the drama and good-natured(?) ribbing certainly add a little
    >spice to the experience.  I love this list.  Jim (snowbound in the North
    >Cascades) Laskey
    >|Brian Whatcott wrote:
    >|> Actually, it is not quite correct to suppose one can strictly refer to
    >|> 0 degrees AND 360 degrees.
    >|Of course. But we can strictly refer to both zero degrees and
    >|Truncating at either 1 or 359 degrees would loose one 360th of the
    >|circle. A small and academic point, perhaps, but one that even a
    >|non-mathematical biologist can understand.
    >|Trevor Kenchington
    >|Trevor J. Kenchington PhD                         Gadus@iStar.ca
    >|Gadus Associates,                                 Office(902) 889-9250
    >|R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour,                     Fax   (902) 889-9251
    >|Nova Scotia  B0J 2L0, CANADA                      Home  (902) 889-3555
    >|                    Science Serving the Fisheries
    >|                     http://home.istar.ca/~gadus

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site