Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Newton and Halley
    From: Nicol�s de Hilster
    Date: 2007 Nov 20, 11:46 +0100

    My ISP upgraded my mailbox by adding a spam-filter and as I do not use
    webmail I missed quite some posts (all with the subject "Newton and
    Halley" after my post with the diagonal scale design). Today I found out
    and read all of them (and killed the spam filter in the meanwhile).
    
    In NavList 3895 George Huxtable wrote on my speculation on Newton's
    diagonal scale:
    > But the problem is that you can't assume ANYTHING about that engraving. It
    > WASN'T  Newton's drawing, which had been lost. It had been drawn by an
    > artist for the Royal Society, and then engraved, long after Newton's death
    > (and after Halley's). It had been drawn from the words of Newton's note.
    > Newton gave the dimensions of the telescope (as three or four feet) but said
    > nothing about the size of the brass plate. It was no more than the
    > imagination of the artist (and then the engraver) that made the plate the
    > same size as the telescope. We are free to interpret the words of Newton's
    > today as we think best, just as the Royal Society artist was free in 1742.
    > And if we think a brass plate of three or four feet across to be impossibly
    > unwieldy (which it would be) then we can make it, say, half the length of
    > the telescope, or whatever we choose. What I am saying is that the engraving
    > that Nicolas is going by is not a document that has any authenticity in
    > itself.
    >
    >
    Yep, I did realize that all too good, but found the coincidence (that
    there was enough space for my design) too good to be true. Besides that
    I was curious if I could design such a diagonal scale and what it would
    look like.
    > It may be, of course, that the original instrument still existed, and was
    > available to be drawn, in 1742. But if it was, I am pretty sure we would
    > have heard about it.
    >
    > None of this detracts, much, from Nicolas' speculation about how it might
    > have been divided.
    >
    >
    Thanks
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site