
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: News Item on Over-reliance on GPS
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2008 Nov 03, 11:03 -0800
From: Lu Abel
Date: 2008 Nov 03, 11:03 -0800
Thanks, Richard!
What's still not clear from the report is whether use of GPS in any way resulted in the boat's running aground. On-shore gale force winds certainly seem like darn sloppy conditions for a 25' sailboat! What the MCA report says is that "the yacht's GPS had failed and the crew could only make a rough estimate of their position [for rescuers]"
It sounds like these folks had less than total situational awareness (eg, didn't know exactly where they had grounded), but that could easily be due to conditions other than the use of GPS -- for example, how many of us could keep a DR plot under the snotty conditions that beset this boat? And the boat did run aground in daylight, so they ought to have seen how near they were getting to the shore.
Again, I'm not excusing poor navigation practices if that's indeed what happened. But I also have a lot of trouble with the tendency of "experts" to assign "GPS problems" as the reason for any on-the-water incident where the boat was carrying and using a GPS. Some on this list are pilots and I understand pilots get very angry when a crash is dismissed as "pilot error" even before an investigation is completed; I see an analogy.
Lu
Richard B. Langley wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
What's still not clear from the report is whether use of GPS in any way resulted in the boat's running aground. On-shore gale force winds certainly seem like darn sloppy conditions for a 25' sailboat! What the MCA report says is that "the yacht's GPS had failed and the crew could only make a rough estimate of their position [for rescuers]"
It sounds like these folks had less than total situational awareness (eg, didn't know exactly where they had grounded), but that could easily be due to conditions other than the use of GPS -- for example, how many of us could keep a DR plot under the snotty conditions that beset this boat? And the boat did run aground in daylight, so they ought to have seen how near they were getting to the shore.
Again, I'm not excusing poor navigation practices if that's indeed what happened. But I also have a lot of trouble with the tendency of "experts" to assign "GPS problems" as the reason for any on-the-water incident where the boat was carrying and using a GPS. Some on this list are pilots and I understand pilots get very angry when a crash is dismissed as "pilot error" even before an investigation is completed; I see an analogy.
Lu
Richard B. Langley wrote:
A little bit more information from the Coast Guard: <http://nds.coi.gov.uk/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=382944&NewsAreaID=2> -- Richard Quoting Lu Abel <lunav@abelhome.net>:It would be nice to have a little more detail on exactly what occurred other than "the GPS failed" When did the GPS fail, was the skipper aware of the problem, and what navigation techniques were employed after the GPS failed? Any skipper who just follows the his GPS blindly without situational awareness is dumb, dumb, dumb. But I don't blame the GPS for that, but over-reliance on it by humans. That's probably the dilemma: with traditional techniques like celestial, bearings, and DR plots, the navigator had a high degree of situational awareness. Using a chart for all this navigation work was unavoidable, giving awareness of what was around and beneath and ahead of the boat. With GPS, sadly, the box just produces magic numbers (or magic "steer in this direction" commands). I teach coastal piloting frequently, I do admit that GPS exists and is a useful tool, I spend time on how to get the most out of it, but then I also spend even more time on how to keep out of trouble when using it, and what to do when the screen goes blank. Lu Richard B. Langley wrote:<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/essex/7704769.stm> =============================================================================== Richard B. Langley E-mail: lang@unb.ca Geodetic Research Laboratory Web: http://www.unb.ca/GGE/ Dept. of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Phone: +1 506 453-5142 University of New Brunswick Fax: +1 506 453-4943 Fredericton, N.B., Canada E3B 5A3 Fredericton? Where's that? See: http://www.city.fredericton.nb.ca/ ============================================================================================================================================================== Richard B. Langley E-mail: lang@unb.ca Geodetic Research Laboratory Web: http://www.unb.ca/GGE/ Dept. of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Phone: +1 506 453-5142 University of New Brunswick Fax: +1 506 453-4943 Fredericton, N.B., Canada E3B 5A3 Fredericton? Where's that? See: http://www.city.fredericton.nb.ca/ ===============================================================================
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---