
NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: News Item on Over-reliance on GPS
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2008 Nov 04, 00:19 -0500
From: Frank Reed
Date: 2008 Nov 04, 00:19 -0500
Lu, you wrote: "But I also have a lot of trouble with the tendency of "experts" to assign "GPS problems" as the reason for any on-the-water incident where the boat was carrying and using a GPS." I agree. It's the "pundit" answer. This incident is also a case where a cheap handheld GPS backup could have made a big difference, not necessarily in saving the boat, but during the rescue. Does anyone know if there is a requirement from any navy or other rule-making body to carry a handheld GPS in a Faraday cage (with backup batteries replaced every six months)? While a sextant might be nice to have, a handheld GPS is smaller, cheaper, easier to maintain and use, much more accurate, and available in all weather. We have all heard reports of GPS "systems" failing, but those are usually integrated charting applications with many sensitive components and the GPS read-out is frequently just a small part. But the loss of all GPS capability aboard a vessel strikes me as bad planning. People carry spare radios to call for help. They carry EPIRBs. Why not spare GPS receivers? Or do they? I understand that some EPIRBs now include GPS positioning. I don't want to stray off-topic here. I'm just wondering about the state of current rules and practice. It strikes me that a rule requiring a sextant is mostly preparing for a disaster with very low probability. -FER --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---