Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    New compact backup CELNAV system
    From: Gary LaPook
    Date: 2009 Feb 24, 12:13 -0800

    On Feb 24, 12:06�pm,  wrote:
    > There are often posts on the Navlist regarding using celestial as a backup 
    to GPS and finding a simple way to do this. I think I have found a method 
    that is simple, self contained, takes up little space, needs no almanac or 
    sight reduction tables and requires no batteries. This method is meant for 
    those who already know celestial navigation and provides a very compact and 
    self-contained system needing no books, almanacs or tables.
    > The first part of the kit is simply the long term almanac from H.O. 249 
    along with the Polaris tables and the Precession & Nutation �table to allow 
    the use of the tabulated coordinates for the stars for a long period of time. 
    Since this almanac only covers the sun and the stars no provision is made for 
    handling planets or the moon but that is not that important for a "backup" 
    celestial method.. However, if you have the Nautical Almanac then you can 
    work with these bodies as well. I have included a form to use with the long 
    term almanac which also includes �tables for correction of observations. The 
    long term almanac consists of nine pages from H.O. 249 plus a computation 
    form which can be printed back to back on only five sheets of paper.
    > The main part of this method relies on my adaptation of the long extinct 
    Bygrave slide Rule which is elegant in its simplicity but which produces 
    altitudes and azimuths within in one or two minutes of arc and takes less 
    than two minutes to do the computation. I have included three PDF files that 
    can be printed out to create a working copy of my adaptation which consists 
    of three �sheets containing the modified scales which can be hole punched and 
    kept in a thin three ring binder (or in an envelope) with the long term 
    almanac and extra forms for recording the computation. The Cotangent scale 
    should be printed out on paper and can be sealed in a plastic sheet for good 
    durability. The Cosine scale and the Vernier are printed out on plastic 
    transparency sheets in an inkjet printer and can also be sealed in additional 
    plastic sheets for durability. The entire backup method is contained on a 
    total of only eight sheets, five for the almanac and three for the Bygrave 
    slide rule!
    > When using the Bygrave slide rule the azimuth and altitude are calculated in 
    three steps using the same manipulations of the slide rule for each step. I 
    will first describe the use of the normal cylindrical Bygrave slide rule 
    which utilizes a cursor or pointers to align the scales. I have also enclosed 
    a copy of the original Bygrave instruction book. The Bygrave has also been 
    discussed on the Navlist.
    > We first calculate the intermediate value "y" (lower case y) �which is found by the formula:
    > tan y = �tan declination / cos H � � � � �(H = Hour angle)
    > This is the formula listed in the Bygrave manual but, in fact, the slide 
    rule does the calculation by modifying this formula to allow the use of the 
    cotangent scale. The actual manipulation of the slide rule uses the 
    re-arranged formula of:
    > cotan y �= �cotan declination x cos H
    > You accomplish this computation by setting one of the pointers (or the 
    cursor on my copy) to zero on the cosine scale and while holding it there 
    rotate the cosine scale and slide it up or down on the cotangent scale so 
    that the other pointer (or cursor) is aligned with the declination on the 
    cotangent scale. Now, holding the cosine scale still, rotate the pointer 
    (cursor) to point at the hour angle (H) on the cosine scale and then read out 
    "y" from the other pointer (cursor) where it points on the cotangent scale.
    > Next you find the second intermediate value,"Y" (upper case Y) by adding "y" 
    to co-latitude (if latitude and declination have the same name) or by 
    subtracting "y" from co-latitude (if of opposite names.)
    > [I kept the original nomenclature from Bygrave so that the original 
    literature can be followed . I think it is confusing to use the same letter 
    of the alphabet for two variables, "y" lower case y, and "Y" upper case Y, 
    and I don't know why Bygrave chose this system. I prefer to replace "y" with 
    "W" in the formulas and have done so on my forms.]
    > Next we find azimuth with the formula :
    > tan Az �= �(tan H x cos y ) / �cos Y
    > which is re-arranged into the form:
    > cot �Az = (cotan H / cos y �) x cos Y
    > Using the same manipulations as before, set one pointer to "y" on the cosine 
    scale and the other pointer on H on the cotangent scale, move the cursor to 
    "Y" on the cosine scale and read out azimuth from the other pointer on the 
    cotangent scale.
    > The third step calculates altitude, Hc. using the formula:
    > tan Hc = cos Az x tan Y
    > with the formula re-arranged into the form:
    > cot �Hc �= cot Y / cos Az
    > set one pointer to Az on the cosine scale with the other pointer to "Y" on 
    the cotangent scale. move the pointer to zero on the cosine scale and read 
    out Hc from the other pointer on the cotangent scale.
    > I have developed an even simpler implementation of the Bygrave, one that is 
    very easy to make since it doesn't require concentric tubes. I made this by 
    printing out the cotangent scale twice on a piece of paper. I then printed 
    the cosine scale in red on a transparent sheet so that the cosine scale can 
    be placed directly on top of the cotangent scale and aligned much like a 
    normal slide rule. We follow the same steps as already described but it is 
    even simpler since no cursor needs to be used. I will illustrate how easy it 
    is to use with an example. I have include a form and pictures of the scales 
    showing this computation.
    > Since the Bygrave doesn't require that the latitude or the LHA to be whole 
    degrees �you can compute Hc for your D.R. position but for convenience in 
    this example we will use 34� N for latitude, for declination, 14� N and the 
    LHA is 346�.
    > Look at illustration number 1 (i.jpg) which shows the form to be used with 
    this simplified model of the Bygrave. The top of the form is used to compute 
    hour angle, "H", in the range of 0� through 90�. You enter the LHA in the 
    proper column and make the computation. You can see in our example we have 
    placed the LHA, 346�, in the column for LHAs in the range of 270� to 360�. 
    The form shows that in this case we subtract LHA from 360� to find "H", hour 
    angle, in this example, 14�. �We have carried this 14� down to the "H" blank 
    on the form and we have entered declination and latitude in the appropriate 
    > [The scales on the original Bygrave ran from 20' up to 89� 40' and then back 
    in the reverse direction from 90�20' to 179�40'. My simplified version 
    eliminates the second set of numbers keeping the scale less cluttered. The 
    original Bygrave allowed hour angles of 0� to 180� east and west (which had 
    been normal celestial practice prior to the introduction of the concept of 
    LHA) but because my version eliminated the second set of numbering on the 
    scales it is necessary to get hour angle, "H", into the range of 0� and 90� 
    which is accomplished on the top part of the form. Other changes were also 
    necessary because of my simplification of the scales and they will be pointed 
    out later.]
    > (To avoid confusion I have switched to using "W" to replace Captain Bygrave's lower case "y.")
    > Next we subtract the latitude from 90� to form co-latitude. If we were using 
    our D.R. latitude we would subtract it from 89� 60' since this notation makes 
    it easy to subtract degrees and minutes. In our example the co-latitude is 
    56�. We use the top of the form to determine if we will be adding or 
    subtracting the intermediate value of "W" to co-latitude. This is determined 
    by the column of the LHA and by the names of the latitude and declination. In 
    our example we can see that we will be adding "W" since LHA is in the last 
    column and the names of the latitude and the declination are the same. Just 
    circle the "+" mark at the bottom of this column and also place a "+" mark on 
    the "W" line under the co-latitude line.(3,4 and 5.jpg)
    > [With the original Bygrave you always added if latitude and declination had 
    the same name and subtracted if of opposite names. Because of my simplified 
    scales you must subtract "W" if same name and LHA between 90� and 270�, and 
    the form accomplishes this. This puts you at exactly the same place on the 
    scales as with the original Bygrave. You still always subtract if of opposite 
    > Next we will follow the zig-zag diagram along the right edge of the form to 
    find the value of "W". The left side of the zig-zag indicates the cosine 
    scale and the right side indicates the cotangent scale. The same process is 
    used three times and values are always taken off from the cotangent scale, 
    never from the cosine scale. The zig-zag tells us to line up 0 (zero) on the 
    red cosine scale with "D" (declination) on the black cotangent scale. We then 
    look at "H" (hour angle) on the red scale and take out "W" from the adjacent 
    cotangent scale. (6.jpg)
    > On both scales the numbering is above and to the right of the marks on the 
    scales. I have aligned the red cosine scale slightly below the black 
    cotangent scale for clarity. We can see that the red zero is lined up 
    directly below the black tick mark for 20� (the declination). You usually use 
    visual interpolation for the minutes of declination. Now, without allowing 
    the scales to shift, we locate "H" on the red scale and read out "W" from the 
    adjacent black scale, in this case 20� 33', and write this value on the "W" 
    line below the co-latitude. (7.jpg)
    > Next we find he second intermediate value, "Y", by first determining "X" by 
    adding "W" to co-latitude, in this example "X" = 76� 33'. Then, following the 
    rule on the form, since "X" < 90 then "Y" = "X" and we carry it down to the 
    "Y" line. If "X" > 90 we would subtract "X" from 180� (or from 179-60) to 
    form "Y".
    > [I introduced this new intermediate variable "X" so that the resulting "Y" 
    will be less than 90� which allowed me to keep the scales less cluttered 
    since the reverse numbering, 90�20' to 179� 40', found on the original 
    Bygrave is not needed.](8 and 9.jpg)
    > We now follow the second zig-zag to find Az . (Note we start with the value 
    computed at the last step, "W.") (10.jpg) Using �the same manipulation as the 
    first time, we line up "W" on the red scale with "H" on the black scale . We 
    than look at "Y" on the red scale and take out Az from the adjacent black 
    scale. Looking at illustration 11 (11.jpg), we have lined up red 20-33 with 
    black 14 by aligning the 20-30 mark slightly to the left of the "14" on the 
    cotangent scale. (Remember at this point on the red scale the short tick 
    marks show 1/2 degree or 30'.) Next we located "Y" on the red scale (76-33) 
    and take out the Az from the black scale. (12.jpg) (The red 76-30 mark is 
    lightly to the left of the black 45 tick mark and the red 76-40 is aligned 
    with the black 45-20 so by visual interpolation the red 76-33 will align with 
    the black 45-09, the Az. (At this point on the scales each tick mark is 10'.)
    > Next enter the Az on the form �and compute Zn by applying the rules on the 
    attached form, in this case the celestial body is to the south east so we 
    subtract Az from 180� (179-60) to determine Zn, 134� 51' (or 134.9�).(13.jpg)
    > [Because of my simplified scales the determination of Zn is different than 
    with the original Bygrave since you can only read out Az �in the range of 0� 
    to 90� with my version while on the original Bygrave the Az was taken out in 
    the range of 0� to 180�. The determination of Zn is usually not a problem in 
    real life since you know the approximate direction of the body when you take 
    the sight. I have include rules to resolve any ambiguity.]
    > We now follow the last zig-zag to calculate Hc. ( Note we again start with 
    the value computed at the last step, Az). (14.jpg) Using the same 
    manipulation as before, we line up Az on the red scale with "Y" on the black 
    scale. �Next we locate zero on the red scale and take out the Hc from the 
    adjacent black scale. Looking at no. 15 (15.jpg) we see that we have aligned 
    he red 45 tick mark slightly to the right of the black 76-30 (each tick mark 
    is 10' on both scales) and we visually interpolate red 45-09 with black 
    76-33. Looking now at no. 16 16.jpg), we find the red zero and interpolate on 
    the black scale to take out the Hc of 71� 17'and enter it on the form. 
    > Comparing our result with H.O. 249 (see no. 18, 18.jpg) we find the Hc in 
    H.O 249 of 71� 17' and Zn of 135�, the same as with the Bygrave.
    > The original Bygrave had a cotangent scale marked every one minute of arc 
    while the cotangent scale of my reproduction is marked every ten minutes and 
    in some cases every five minutes. The original cosine scale was marked at 
    varying spacing and my recreation is also, but not as frequently as on the 
    original. At most places on these scales it is sufficiently accurate to 
    visually interpolate. However, at places where the scale markings are far 
    apart, visual interpolation is not accurate enough. To improve the accuracy 
    of my reproduction I have added a scale that assists in interpolation. This 
    scale consists of a small diagram with converging numbered lines and should 
    be used on the cosine scale above 80� and on the cotangent scale above 80� 
    and below 10�. To use it slide it up until the outside lines, labeled zero 
    and ten, fit between two marks on the main scales and then use the 
    intermediate lines for the interpolation. In most cases it is not necessary 
    to use this vernier. If the scales were more finely divided this Vernier 
    could be dispensed with completely.
    > There are some unusual cases that require slightly different procedures and 
    all of these special cases are described on the form. If "H" is less than 1� 
    or greater than 89� (actually 89� 15' on my version) simply assume a 
    longitude to bring "H" within the range of the scales. The intercept will be 
    longer but perfectly usable for practical navigation.
    > If the computed azimuth is greater than 85� the computed altitude will lose 
    accuracy even though the Az is accurate. For azimuths in this range even 
    rounding the azimuth up or down one half minute can change the Hc by ten 
    minutes. So you use the azimuth but you compute altitude by interchanging 
    declination and latitude and then doing the normal computation. You discard 
    the azimuth derived during the computation of altitude and use the original 
    > When declination is less than 55' on my version (less than 20' on the 
    original) you can't compute "W" because you start the process with 
    declination on the cotangent scale. In this case, Bygrave says to use the 
    same process as when the azimuth exceeds 85�, you simply interchange 
    declination and latitude and compute altitude. But Bygrave didn't tell us how 
    to calculate azimuth in this case. In my testing I have found a method that 
    �produces quite accurate azimuths. You simply skip the computation of "W" and 
    simply set "W" equal to declination. The �worst case I have found is that the 
    azimuth is within 0.9� of the true azimuth but most are much closer. If the 
    declination is less than one degree and the latitude is also less than one 
    degree, follow this procedure and also assume a latitude equal to one degree. 
    After you have computed the Az you then follow the same procedure discussed 
    above for azimuths exceeding 85� by interchanging the latitude and 
    declination and then computing �Hc.
    > Another rare possibility is that "Y" will exceed 89� 15' after adding "W" to 
    co-declination so it won't fit on the scale. The simple way to handle this 
    situation is to assume a latitude so the "Y" does fit on the scale even 
    though the resulting intercept is longer but still usable.
    > An extremely unlikely case (I only mention it to be complete) is that "W" 
    exceeds the range of the cotangent scale, 89�15', so cannot be computed in 
    the first step of the process. �This can only happen when shooting one star, 
    Kochab, which has a declination of 74�13' north and then only if "H" exceeds 
    87� 20', an extremely unlikely event.
    > I am attaching a revised form to use with the Bygrave slide rule. This form 
    steps you through the computation and contains
    > �the rules for the special cases. The special cases are likely to come up only very rarely in practice.
    > �The first rule for H < 1� or H > 89� only involves LHAs covering 4 degrees 
    out of 360� (LHA in the ranges of 0 -1, 89-91, 269-271, and 359-360) so only 
    occurs by chance very rarely and these can be avoided if sights are 
    preplanned as is the normal procedure for flight navigation. Worst case, you 
    have to change the time of the observation by four minutes.
    > Rule 3 covers the case when Y exceeds 89� which covers a range of two 
    degrees out of a possible 180� so is also very rare. Co-lat is in the range 
    of 0-90 and W is also in the same range so X comes in the range of 0 -180. If 
    X is less than 89 then Y is also less than 89. If X is greater than 91 then Y 
    is less than 89 also. Only in the case of X between 89 and 91 will Y exceed 
    89. This situation can't be avoided in advance because you can't predict what 
    the value of W will be but just assuming a latitude that differs by one 
    degree solves the problem which will result in a longer intercept but one 
    that is still usable.
    > The fourth rule deals with cases of bodies bearing almost directly east or 
    west and this situation can be avoided by choosing a different body to shoot 
    or, if only the sun is available,by waiting a few minutes to allow the 
    azimuth to change out of this range.
    > The remaining situation covered by rule two (declinations less than one 
    degree) concerns only bodies in the solar system since none of the 
    navigational stars have declinations less than one degree. Obviously the most 
    important body is the sun and its declination is between 1� north and 1� 
    south for five days in March and again in September so this situation can't 
    be avoided and this is the most important special case. The special rule 
    handles it nicely and the Hc is completely accurate. The computed azimuth is 
    an approximation but is never more than one degree different than the actual 
    azimuth and is usually much closer. Since you can use your D.R. for the A.P. 
    the intercepts are short and this slight inaccuracy in the azimuth will not 
    make a noticeable difference in the LOP.
    > So give it a try and let me know what you think.
    > Gary J. LaPook
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/1.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/2.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/3.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/4.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/5.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/6.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/7.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/8.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/9.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/10.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/11.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/12.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/13.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/14.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/15.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/16.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/17.JPG
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/18.pdf
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/Almanac-form.pdf
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/Backup-navigation-tables.pdf
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/Bygrave-form-.pdf
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/Vernier.pdf
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/Cosine-Scale.pdf
    > Linked File:http://www.fer3.com/arc/imgx/Cotangent-.pdf
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site