Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Navigation without Leap Seconds
    From: Richard B. Langley
    Date: 2008 Apr 22, 09:30 -0300

    Fig. 1 in the article on leap seconds for which I posted a URL a few days ago
    shows delta-T between 1600 and 2000 on a linear scale.
    -- Richard Langley
    
    On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, George Huxtable wrote:
    
    >
    >Geoffrey Kolbe and I seem to agree well, now, about the difficulties in
    >predicting future changes in delta-T.
    >
    >However, his posting ended with-
    >
    >| George's Delta T = 0 for the epoch of 1900 for a current value of 38
    >| seconds for Delta T seems to be adding to the chaos which he feared with
    >| different time systems. In such literature as I have read on the subject,
    >a
    >| value of 24.349 is used for the 1900 epoch, with a current value of about
    >| 65 seconds. See, for example, ftp://maia.usno.navy.mil/ser7/deltat.preds I
    >| would be interested to know where George got his value for Delta T.
    >
    >Sorry about that.
    >
    >Geoffrey asks where I got that "current value of 38 seconds for Delta T"
    >from, and I am rather ashamed to say that I simply pulled it out of my
    >memory, and got it quite wrong. I should have known better. A current value
    >for delta-t, for 2008, will be somewhere round 65 seconds, not 38 seconds,
    >just as he says.
    >
    >However, Geoffrey and I seem to disagree seriously about its earlier value,
    >around 1900, which he states to be 24.349 seconds. I'm not sure where that
    >comes from, but not from the web page that he quotes, which deals only with
    >recent years. I have in front of me the "Explanatory Supplement to the
    >Ephemeris", 1974 amended impression , which gives, in table 3.1, delta-t
    >values until 1972. The value for the year 1900.5 is -3.90 sec, and values
    >were negative from 1869 to 1902, reaching an extreme value of -8.23 sec  in
    >1892. If the deceleration of the Earth was steady, then delta-t would follow
    >a parabolic curve, but it's vastly perturbed by those short-term
    >fluctuations. There may well have been recent reassessments of the
    >historical changes in delta-t, but surely not enough to account for the big
    >discrepancy between that table and the number that Geoffrey quotes.
    >
    >Between the two of us, we seem to have added rather a lot to the chaos that
    >I warned against...
    >
    >By the way, if anyone chooses to look up that volume, they should be careful
    >about the graph on the facing page to the table, fig 3.2, which purports to
    >show "general trends of delta-T, 1660-1972". This was taken from a paper
    >intended to show up other matters, in which much readjustment of the numbers
    >had taken place. In a later edition, this was replaced by a version of fig
    >3.2 that was completely revised, and now accords with the numbers in the
    >table.
    >
    >A completely revised "Explanatory supplement" appeared in 1992, edited by
    >Seidelmann, excellent in many ways, but this doesn't tabulate delta-t
    >changes, and its graph is on a compressed log scale, from which it's
    >impossible to extract numerical values.
    >
    >George.
    >
    >contact George Huxtable at george@huxtable.u-net.com
    >or at +44 1865 820222 (from UK, 01865 820222)
    >or at 1 Sandy Lane, Southmoor, Abingdon, Oxon OX13 5HX, UK.
    >
    >
    >>
    >
    
    
    ===============================================================================
     Richard B. Langley                            E-mail: lang@unb.ca
     Geodetic Research Laboratory                  Web: http://www.unb.ca/GGE/
     Dept. of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering    Phone:    +1 506 453-5142
     University of New Brunswick                   Fax:      +1 506 453-4943
     Fredericton, N.B., Canada  E3B 5A3
         Fredericton?  Where's that?  See: http://www.city.fredericton.nb.ca/
    ===============================================================================
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site