NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Navigation without Leap Seconds
From: Geoffrey Kolbe
Date: 2008 Apr 21, 19:43 +0100
From: Geoffrey Kolbe
Date: 2008 Apr 21, 19:43 +0100
>Response from George- NavList 4880 > >I wonder how confident Geoffrey really is about that projection into the >future, to within a second "or so". As ever, thanks to George for his thoughtful and thought provoking piece on Delta T. Alas, I did not write the software program which I used to derive my tables. I used the Stormy Weather 'Astro' program written by Paul Adamthwaite (www.stormy.ca) to derive the quadrennial coefficients. Prodded by George, I contacted Paul Adamthwaite and asked him for his latest thinking on the Delta T problem and its impact on his program - and on my almanac in consequence. It turns out that there is quite a bit of interest from a number of other concerns on the Delta T matter and Paul has been researching the matter in some depth. Indeed, he is giving a talk on the subject as part of the celebrations marking upcoming centenary of the Canadian Navy. Paul is currently awaiting feedback from the Paris Observatory, who have been doing a lot of theoretical modelling on the Delta T matter. Paul says there is now a much better understanding of the Delta T problem and there are theorists who are confident that that they can predict Delta T to an accuracy of about two seconds over the next fifty years. But - pending the outcome of the Paris Observatory's deliberations - Paul feels an error margin of ten seconds is one with which he feels more comfortable. A second edition of my Long Term Almanac 2000 - 2050 is currently being prepared. I will be inserting a caveat on the matter of Delta T and a warning about the possible abolition of leap-seconds in this edition. George's Delta T = 0 for the epoch of 1900 for a current value of 38 seconds for Delta T seems to be adding to the chaos which he feared with different time systems. In such literature as I have read on the subject, a value of 24.349 is used for the 1900 epoch, with a current value of about 65 seconds. See, for example, ftp://maia.usno.navy.mil/ser7/deltat.preds I would be interested to know where George got his value for Delta T. Geoffrey Kolbe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc To post, email NavList@fer3.com To , email NavList-@fer3.com -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---