Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Navigation without Leap Seconds
    From: Geoffrey Kolbe
    Date: 2008 Apr 21, 19:43 +0100

    >Response from George- NavList 4880
    >I wonder how confident Geoffrey really is about that projection into the
    >future, to within a second "or so".
    As ever, thanks to George for his thoughtful and thought provoking piece on
    Delta T.
    Alas, I did not write the software program which I used to derive my
    tables. I used the Stormy Weather 'Astro' program written by Paul
    Adamthwaite (www.stormy.ca) to derive the quadrennial coefficients.
    Prodded by George, I contacted Paul Adamthwaite and asked him for his
    latest thinking on the Delta T problem and its impact on his program - and
    on my almanac in consequence. It turns out that there is quite a bit of
    interest from a number of other concerns on the Delta T matter and Paul has
    been researching the matter in some depth. Indeed, he is giving a talk on
    the subject as part of the celebrations marking upcoming centenary of the
    Canadian Navy.
    Paul is currently awaiting feedback from the Paris Observatory, who have
    been doing a lot of theoretical modelling on the Delta T matter. Paul says
    there is now a much better understanding of the Delta T problem and there
    are theorists who are confident that that they can predict Delta T to an
    accuracy of about two seconds over the next fifty years. But - pending the
    outcome of the Paris Observatory's deliberations - Paul feels an error
    margin of ten seconds is one with which he feels more comfortable.
    A second edition of my Long Term Almanac 2000 - 2050 is currently being
    prepared. I will be inserting a caveat on the matter of Delta T and a
    warning about the possible abolition of leap-seconds in this edition.
    George's Delta T = 0 for the epoch of 1900 for a current value of 38
    seconds for Delta T seems to be adding to the chaos which he feared with
    different time systems. In such literature as I have read on the subject, a
    value of 24.349 is used for the 1900 epoch, with a current value of about
    65 seconds. See, for example, ftp://maia.usno.navy.mil/ser7/deltat.preds I
    would be interested to know where George got his value for Delta T.
    Geoffrey Kolbe
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, email NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site