Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Navigation without Leap Seconds
    From: Geoffrey Kolbe
    Date: 2008 Apr 18, 22:23 +0100

    
    
    
    >
    >
    >Geoffrey Kolbe wrote:
    > > Well, my Long Term Almanac is nominally good up to the year 2050 and will
    > > actually work OK up until 2060. So this is a very real question for me.
    > >
    > > I am assuming that if leap seconds are abolished, anyone using my tables -
    > > which assume GMT, or UT1 as it is called these days - will know the
    > > difference between broadcast time and GMT and use this as a correction to
    > > broadcast time.
    > >
    
    Lu Abel wrote:
    
    >
    >On the contrary, your long term almanac is based on the measurement of
    >"what time is it" at some point in time (likely when it was published).
    >So it does NOT correct for leap-seconds, since there is no way to
    >predict when they will be inserted into UTC.   So it is effectively
    >already practicing leap-second-less navigation.
    >
    >I don't know how old your long term almanac is, but if it's old enough
    >it would be interesting to compare its data with current Nautical
    >Almanac data; I'll bet there might be some small discrepancies in some
    >GHA predictions.
    >
    >Lu
    
    
    Geoffrey Kolbe responds:
    
    Hello Lu.
    
    Actually, the theory used to generate my tables includes an estimation for
    delta T, the difference between ephemeris time and Universal Time. How
    delta T will vary in the future is not that well understood, of course,
    which means that by 2050 my tables will probably be out by a second or so.
    But never-the-less, a knowledge of DUT1, which is the difference between
    UT1 (which used to be called GMT and is based on the mean length of the
    solar day, which is growing longer) and UTC (broadcast time, derived from
    an atomic clock), is necessary to adjust broadcast time for use with my
    almanac, which is based on UT1.
    
    At the moment, the use of leap-seconds currently keeps DUT1 to less than
    0.9 seconds. So if UTC is treated as being the same as UT1, which is what
    most of us do, then a maximum error of about quarter of a minute in
    longitude for a position using traditional celestial navigation methods, is
    quite tolerable.  But if leap-seconds are abolished, it would only be a few
    years before broadcast time would have to be routinely adjusted using DUT1
    for use with my tables.
    
    Current and historical values of DUT1 can be obtained from
    http://maia.usno.navy.mil/search/search.html
    
    At the moment, the value of DUT1, which is UT1 - UTC, is about -0.38 seconds
    
    Geoffrey Kolbe
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
    To post, email NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site