Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Navigation in Fog
    From: Nicolàs de Hilster
    Date: 2007 Feb 18, 12:22 +0100
    Dear Gary,

    Great pictures!

    Please correct me if I am wrong. From what I understand is that you get great repeatability, but not a good absolute value. I assume you will need to calibrate the whole setup so that when the polarising filter 'disappears' against the background the orientation is truly towards the sun. Is there an easy way to do this calibration? Would you be able to do this experiment while still observing the sun directly, or should the sun already be below the horizon? Have you any idea how accurate such a calibration would be?

    Nicolàs




    glapook{at}PACBELL.NET wrote:
    To follow up on my previous post about the "sky compass."
    
    As an experiment I cut out a small rectangle of celophane and laid it
    on top of a polaroid camera filter. I then balanced this on top of my
    astro-compass and placed a small mirror below it so that I could look
    through the celophane-polaroid filter combination up at the zenith. I
    used the astro-compass because it has a base that can be leveled and
    it rotates against an azimuth scale so that I could make  accurate
    readings. I waited for the sun to be setting and then rotated the
    astro-compass to cause the light to match on the filter and celophane.
    This match point is very distinct. Rotate it slightly to the right and
    the celophane portion is darker than the uncovered part of the filter,
    too far left and the celophane was lighter than the other part. By
    rotating the compass both right and left and reading the azimuth at
    the match point I determined that the repeatabliity of this reading
    was plus or minus only two degrees, close enough for practical
    navigation. If anyone is intersted I took some pictures of this
    operation and I could scan the relevant pages from H.O. 216. and could
    send them to you.
    
    Gary LaPook
    
    On Feb 17, 10:50 am, "Marcel Tschudin" <marcel.e.tschu...---.com>
    wrote:
      
    I could imagine that this information would be useful for the authors
    of the paper. Of interest to me would be how such a "sky compass"
    would look like manufactured with the skills of the Vikings.
    
    The article which I read was written by one of the co-authors and
    appeared in a Swiss newspaper. For those of you who are interested
    (Wolfgang?), you can find it herehttp://www.nzz.ch/2007/02/14/ft/articleEV4VN.html
    
    Marcel
    
    On 2/17/07, glap...---.net <glap...---.net> wrote:
    
    
    
        
    This technique was used in the "sky compass" (invented in 1948) which
    mounted in the sextant mount of aircraft for polar navigation. It
    works by determining the polarization of light directly overhead, at
    the zeneth, which then shows the azimuth to the sun even though the
    sun is not visible and possibly several degrees below the horizon.
    These "twilight periods" can last for weeks in high latitudes. The
    sky compass is completely discribed in "Air Navigation" H.O. 216
    (1962) and is also mentioned in "Bowditch" (1962.)
          
    You can experiment and see how it works. Get a polarizing filter,
    either for a camera or a polarized sun glass lens. Hold it overhead,
    looking through it at the zenith and rotate it in azimuth and you will
    see the sky alternately lighten and darken as the polarizer
    alternately lines up with the polarization axis of the sun light, it's
    azimuth, and then crosses it. The light and dark points are 90º apart.
    Although this can give you a general azimuth to the sun the change in
    intensity is hard to judge accurately. So the next step is to get a
    piece of cellophane from a craft shop (or they may still use it on
    cigarette packs). Cut a piece to cover half of the poarizer and place
    it on top of the lens, between the lens and the sky, then try the
    experiment again. The two halves of the view through the polarizer
    will lighten and darken out of phase with each other. (You may have to
    try different orientations of the cellophane.) You will find four
    points where both sides will be the same intensity and this is very
    sharp and can be judged accurately but this causes a 90º ambiguity. By
    adjusting the orientation of the cellophane you will end up with four
    match points but two will be darker than the other two. This leaves
    you with an easy to manage 180º ambiguity.
          
    It works.
          
    Gary LaPook
    On Feb 14, 7:40 pm, "Peter Fogg" <peter.f...---.com> wrote:
          
     Marcel Tschudin wrote:
            
    Just read in German a summary on a published paper. The author(s?)
    investigate(s) whether it was possible for the Vikings to use the
    polarised light of the sky for navigation, this with the help of the
    "sun stone" (Sonnenstein). Those of you who are interested in this may
    read the original paper in English:
              
     Polarising filters can indicate the direction of the sun, even under
    overcast skies, and have proved useful for this, especially in Arctic
    regions.
            
    Here is that abstract, from:http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/(byfonk55wemothqi02m1ir45)/app/hom...
            
    *Abstract:*
            
    In sunshine, the Vikings navigated on the open sea using sundials. According
    to a widespread hypothesis, when the Sun was occluded by fog or clouds the
    Vikings might have navigated by skylight polarization detected with an
    enigmatic birefringent crystal (sunstone). There are two atmospheric optical
    prerequisites for this alleged polarimetric Viking navigation under
    foggy/cloudy skies: (1) the degree of linear polarization *p* of skylight
    should be high enough and (2) at a given Sun position, the pattern of the
    angle of polarization *α* of the foggy/cloudy sky should be similar to that
    of the clear sky. Until now, these prerequisites have not been investigated.
    Using full-sky imaging polarimetry, we measured the *p*- and *α*-patterns of
    Arctic foggy and cloudy skies when the Sun was invisible. These patterns
    were compared with the polarization patterns of clear Arctic skies. We show
    here that although prerequisite (2) is always fulfilled under both foggy and
    cloudy conditions, if the fog layer is illuminated by direct sunlight,
    prerequisite (1) is usually satisfied only for cloudy skies. In sunlit fog,
    the Vikings could have navigated by polarization only, if *p* of light from
    the foggy sky was sufficiently high.
            
    
    
    
    
    
      


    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site