NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Navigating Around Hills and Dips in the Ocean
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2003 Aug 16, 11:11 -0300
From: Trevor Kenchington
Date: 2003 Aug 16, 11:11 -0300
George Huxtable wrote: > I hope we will agree that a pendulum will point in the direction > of the local gravity vector, and the plane of the local sea-surface > (horizon) will be exactly at right-angles to that direction. As a starting point for George's explanation of why water piles up over a gravitational high, rather than the surface being pulled downward by the increased force, I fully agree. However, as a description of the real sea surface, I do not. The real ocean surface is sloped, relative to the "gravitational equipotential surface" (George's term) by a number of factors. Aside from transient effects (storm surges, tides and whatever), there is a permanent set up along some ocean margins (and a corresponding lowering elsewhere) caused by average wind stress. There are also hills and dips caused by water temperatures and salinities: It takes a deeper column of warm, fresh water to achieve some particular pressure at the seabed than is needed if the water is cold and salty. Where two water masses abutt, if the pressures are not equal at the same depth, the one body of water will push under the other, lifting it. The net effect is that the sea surface is higher where the water is warmer and fresher. I forget the exact figure but there is an appreciable difference in elevation of sea surface across the Gulf Stream as a consequence of this effect. While I agree with George that there would be no virtue in routing ships around the hills and valleys created by gravity anomalies, in order to save the energy cost of climbing the hill, there _might_ be some benefit in avoiding these other types of hills. I would suspect that it is at most a minor consideration in vessel routing (avoiding of benefiting from the Gulf Stream current would be of far greater concern than its effect on elevation) but perhaps somebody takes it into account. Trevor Kenchington -- Trevor J. Kenchington PhD Gadus@iStar.ca Gadus Associates, Office(902) 889-9250 R.R.#1, Musquodoboit Harbour, Fax (902) 889-9251 Nova Scotia B0J 2L0, CANADA Home (902) 889-3555 Science Serving the Fisheries http://home.istar.ca/~gadus