NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: Nav Exercise #4- Amplitude of the Sun
From: Jeremy C
Date: 2008 May 24, 21:03 EDT
Not much time right now for matters navigational, but couldn't resist having a quick look at an amplitude. Via a somewhat crude method, using tables for another purpose, have calculated amplitude at between 17d and 18d.
Since at sunset azimuth = 270d + amplitude N, - amplitude S, the derived azimuth becomes about 287.5d.
My text advises:
"To observe the altitude close to zero, the Sun should be observed when the lower limb lies about a semi-diameter above the horizon, and the Moon when the upper limb touches the horizon - at the time of appearing and disappearing"
Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
From: Jeremy C
Date: 2008 May 24, 21:03 EDT
Not much time right now for matters navigational, but couldn't resist having a quick look at an amplitude. Via a somewhat crude method, using tables for another purpose, have calculated amplitude at between 17d and 18d.
Since at sunset azimuth = 270d + amplitude N, - amplitude S, the derived azimuth becomes about 287.5d.
Within half a degree so good enough for most compasses. :-)
My text advises:
"To observe the altitude close to zero, the Sun should be observed when the lower limb lies about a semi-diameter above the horizon, and the Moon when the upper limb touches the horizon - at the time of appearing and disappearing"
I was taught that the sun is on the celestial horizon (to avoid another
tabular correction) when the lower limb is 2/3 of the sun's diameter above the
visible horizon. I think your text is fairly close in practical use to the
adage I learned. For stars and planets it is when the body is again 2/3 of
the _sun's_ diameter above the horizon, so there is a bit more guess work
here.
The moon is altogether different and very difficult to shoot when on
the celestial horizon, which is at the time when the upper limb is on the
visible horizon. Now you have to pre-work the amplitude (in the AM) and
hope you catch it as it peeks above the horizon. I think it would be akin
of shooting the bearing of a green flash. Obviously a PM amp is better to
shoot, but still hard to get an accurate reading since it will need to be a very
quick affair. A far better method of shooting the moon amplitude is to
shoot when the center of the body is on the visible horizon and then make the
aforementioned correction _in the opposite direction_ of the sun correction on
the visible horizon. I have yet to shoot a moon amplitude, so can't claim
the accuracy of this method.
Jeremy
Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Navigation List archive: www.fer3.com/arc
To post, email NavList@fer3.com
To , email NavList-@fer3.com
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---