NavList:
A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding
Re: The Nautilus
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2013 Dec 29, 01:41 -0500
From: Brad Morris
Date: 2013 Dec 29, 01:41 -0500
Hey, I wasn't there. Captain Anderson was and these are his declassified results, published under his own name. I'm not about to call him a liar!
On Dec 29, 2013 1:36 AM, "Alexandre Eremenko" <eremenko@math.purdue.edu> wrote:
Brad, > In this book, Captain Anderson gives us the accuracy of generation 1 > inertial navigation equipment as compared to his celestial equipment. So > without further ado, Captain Anderson states that after a 2000 mile > journey > under the polar ice cap the difference between his inertial navigation > equipment and his celestial fix was 1 nautical mile. Call it 1 part in > 2000! This is not consistent with the data on the accuracy of modern inertial navigation systems which were discussed on this list approx two years ago. The discussion had ballistic missiles in the title, but it was mostly about inertial navigation. Some data from manufacturer advertisements were posted. They are worse by orders of magnitude, if I remember correctly. Perhaps we had a regress in this technology since the times of Nautilus:-) Alex.