Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    or...
       
    Reply
    Re: Nautical almanac 1773
    From: Frank Reed
    Date: 2007 Apr 30, 17:34 -0400

    Michael, you wrote:
    
    "In reference to the almanac page posted by Walden that shows the lunar
    distance for Antares on 8/1/773 at noon to be 48-18-36.
    I have some questions.
    1) What delta T would be appropriate for that date?"
    
    My online lunar distance tools use dT=15 for 1770, dT=16 for 1780, and
    simple linear interpolation for dates in between. So roughly dT=15.4 for
    this date. Not significantly different from dT=15.0.
    
    And you wrote:
    "2) Would that distance be based on topo position or apparent position or
    something else? And what location would be assummed?"
    
    The distance in the Nautical Almanac from any year before 1834 is the
    geocentric distance at a particular moment of Greenwich Apparent Time. From
    a modern perspective, this is the LD at a given value of Sun GHA. In
    calculational terms, you do a little loop for GMT around the time in
    question, until the Sun's GHA has the required value. For example, if I want
    some astronomical quantity for 1500 GAT, I need to find the exact GMT when
    the Sun's GHA is 45 degrees (three hours past noon). Through 1833, the
    Nautical Almanac listed the LDs in GAT. After that, they were listed in
    terms of GMT, which is more appropriate for comparisons with chronometers.
    
    And you wrote:
    "3) What distance is given by current almanac programs for that date?"
    
    Matching the value you've listed as "apparent", 48-14-56 would be the
    geocentric LD for 1200 GMT.
    
    To compare with the published almanac, we need the LD for 1200 GAT. My
    online tools at www.HistoricalAtlas.com/lunars have provided this
    information for about three years. You can select GAT for the data output.
    When you do this for the date in question, you find 48-18-16 at 1200 GAT,
    which differs 20 arcseconds from the published value. So for a navigator "at
    sea", no matter how well the observation was made, the resulting longitude
    would be in error by about 10 minutes of arc. It is possible to correct this
    error later when the expedition returns to England... if the astronomers at
    Greenwich were observing frequently and if they had good weather. In fact,
    even without a published Nautical Almanac or any theory of the Moon's motion
    at all, observations from different observers could be cleared and compared
    to yield an accurate difference in longitude. I know of only one case where
    this was certainly done, but there may have been a few others, especially
    for longitudes as important as these. It was a lot of computational labor
    and probably not worth the effort since chronometers were improving so
    rapidly.
    
    One other issue you have to worry about with old almanac data and
    navigational observations is the choice of date accounting. There's the
    common, modern dating system where the day starts at midnight. There's the
    sea account system where the day starts at noon. And then there's the
    astronomical day which also starts at noon --but not on the same day as the
    sea account. :-) Luckily, in published tables and logbooks, it's not hard at
    all to figure out which one is used. They often say so explicitly and if
    not, it's clear from the measured distances and altitudes. The tools on my
    web site incidentally assume that the entered or selected date is the
    standard modern date.
    
     -FER
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    To post to this group, send email to NavList@fer3.com
    To unsubscribe, send email to NavList-unsubscribe@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site