Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: The Nautical Mile?
    From: Robert VanderPol II
    Date: 2020 Oct 30, 17:39 -0700


    I do not have answers to your questions but I do have an observation:

    The length of a arc-min angle across the surface of the earth varies by about 0.5% (10m/1852m = 0.0054).

    If CelNav was using the distances rather than angles the accumulating error could become significant.  For example shooting the sun at the horizon the error would be 5400nm x 0.0054 = 29.2nm.  That's significantly larger than the expected 5-10nmm error for small navigation.

    But the intercept method generally used sticks with angles almost to the end and only uses a relatively very small distance.  This method uses angles for both the calculated and apparent altitudes to they are both using the same basis  which is a perfect sphere.  Distance in nautical miles only appears when you determine the altitude intercept distance.  If you have a big intercept it would be a degree.  The distance error from 1 degree on intercept distance would be 60nm X 0.0054 = 0.324nm.  That is significantly better than the normally expected error.

    So the varying length of a nautical mile only creates a relatively small error for celestial navigation as it is normally practiced.

    That said I do not wish to discourage your from pursuing the answers to your questions, they are of interest in and of themselves and look forward to your discoveries.

    I have found an online calculator that claims up to 130 place precision.  Precision is user defined.  I have not tested it and have no opinion about it's accuracy.


    Bob II

    The Nautical Mile?
    From: Mike Freeman
    Date: 2020 Oct 30, 00:59 -0700

    I am having difficulty correlating all the information I read about the nautical mile and hope you can help. Either confirm my understanding or correct me.

    I have a book - The Oxford Companion to Ships and the Sea. Peter Kemp and copy a sentence from it............

    A nautical mile is the distance on the earths surface subtended by one minute of latitude at the earths centre.

    If the earth was a perfect sphere we could make divisions 5,400 of 1 minute at the earth centre. equator to pole and extend/subtend each minute to the earth surface and we would have 5,400 perfect nautical miles of +/- 1852m.

    However with the earth being an oblate spheroid and having a greater radius at the equator if we subtend 1 minute of latitude at/near the equator the radius lines (radians?) travel further and are therefore diverging for longer which when calculated yields a nautical mile a few metres greater than 1852m. Conversely if the same calculation is performed for the pole a nautical mile of less than 1852m is determined.

    As we know a nautical mile at the pole is greater (1862m?) and at the equator less (1843?) therefore the above calculation is obviously incorrect.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site