Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: NASR question on large F values
    From: John Pinto
    Date: 2021 Jun 3, 13:52 -0700

    Let us say we could actually see this Sun in that instance.  How would we calculate Z2?  That is really the source of the question about the large negative F value.  It is a little ambiguous (to me) in the NA explanation for this unusual case. 

    Pretty straightforward if F is positive how to set Z2 in the form but if F is negative and its absolute value is greater than 90 I'm not sure how to use the Z2 value in the NASR table to fill in the Z2 value in the form. 

    Do you first negate the Z2 value from the table and then perform 180-Z2  (subtracting a negative is just addition, so it just becomes 180+Z2) or do you first perform 180 - the Z2 value from the table and then make the result negative?  You get very different answers for the resulting Z2 in the form dependnig on which operations you perform first.

    It is unclear to me if this unusual case was even considered in those instructions.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site