Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.

NavList:

A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Message:αβγ
Message:abc
Add Images & Files
    Name or NavList Code:
    Email:
       
    Reply
    Re: Multi-Moon line exercise in 2 parts
    From: Christian Scheele
    Date: 2009 Aug 11, 20:19 +0200

    Thanks for taking me through this, I was hoping somebody would do so. You
    say that determining the azimuth is impractical is impractical. This is why
    times of sunrise/sunset at one of the equinoxes are chosen as point of
    departure in the exercise on the ION webpage that I was drawing attention
    to, allowing its solution. I agree, it is impractical.
    
    Are you of the opinion that Charles Cotter's method to determine the passage
    of time between the sun's meridian passage and its maximum height is a
    simplification, however acceptable in view of its purpose? I understand that
    you are an expert on Cotter. I was thinking that an exact result would
    require a kind of integral in order to take the changing dh/dt of the sun
    into consideration, both as far as the change in declination as well as the
    observer's own movement are concerned. Cotter apppears to be assuming
    constant values for dlong and dlat. I'm not too strong on the maths side, so
    I'm stuck at this point.
    
    Is anybody further on Byrd and Weems?
    
    Christian Scheele
    
    George Huxtable wrote:
     ....
    > normal altitude navigation, altitudes are measured, routinely, to within 1
    > part in 5000 of the maximum range of 0 to 90 degrees. To do similarly well
    > by using rate-of-rise, you would have to measure that to within 1 part in
    > 5000 also. To do that by timing the rising or setting of the Sun, which
    > can
    > be over in 2 minutes, would call for timing that to a fortieth of a second
    > of time, and for establishing contact of the Sun's limbs with the sea
    > horizon to within a third of a second of arc. It's completely impractical,
    > just as establishing position around that circle by a measurement of
    > azimuth
    > is completely impractical. Only at sea, mind you. On land, measurement of
    > azimuth can be highly precise.
    >
    > Jeremy has provided the list with useful real information by which we can
    > assess the drawbacks of the proposed "rapid-fire" method. From his
    > comments,
    > he takes a realistic view of its limitations. So should we all.
    >
    > George.
    
    
    --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
    NavList message boards: www.fer3.com/arc
    Or post by email to: NavList@fer3.com
    To , email NavList-@fer3.com
    -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
    
    

       
    Reply
    Browse Files

    Drop Files

    NavList

    What is NavList?

    Get a NavList ID Code

    Name:
    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Email:
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    A NavList ID Code guarantees your identity in NavList posts and allows faster posting of messages.

    Retrieve a NavList ID Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your NavList code will be emailed to you immediately.
    Email:

    Email Settings

    NavList ID Code:

    Custom Index

    Subject:
    Author:
    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site