Welcome to the NavList Message Boards.


A Community Devoted to the Preservation and Practice of Celestial Navigation and Other Methods of Traditional Wayfinding

Compose Your Message

Add Images & Files
    Re: Modern Lunars
    From: Paul Hirose
    Date: 2016 Sep 25, 16:44 -0700

    On 2016-09-25 3:08, Antoine Couëtte wrote:
    > BTW, could you *not* perform the Moon "center of mass to center of figure 
    correction" more accurately now since the most recent modern Theories also 
    give Libration angles. *Yes?*
    It's true that many (not all) JPL ephemerides include the libration
    angles. No doubt accuracy would improve if they were applied to a
    mathematical model of the limb. But I think even the standard fixed
    corrections of +0.5″ in longitude and -0.25″ can be ignored in most
    lunar distance computations.
    My software has an option (by default it's not selected) to apply them
    if the user wants extra accuracy. A sextant is readable to 6″, and my
    goal is 0.6″ accuracy. (There is a rule of thumb in electronics that
    test equipment should be 10x better than the device under test.) I think
    we can hit that target, or get pretty close, with the standard corrections.
    I'm surprised that you didn't comment on the 0.0002° systematic
    discrepancy in our topocentric apparent unrefracted Moon position in the
    1855 lunar. That's 0.7″.
    > Modern computing power enables to tackle Lunars [much] better than the 
    Classical Methods could and can [ever] do it. The Sextant "Observed Refracted 
    Distances" have now become the main computation variables and benchmarks. No 
    longer need to use the Classical [and formerly unavoidable] intermediate 
    variables - i.e. the "*Cleared Distances*" - which sometimes vary with Time 
    (UT1) in a manner totally different from their Observed Sextant Distances 
    I've never seen any evidence that the "modern lunar" has a significant
    advantage over the traditional solution if you avoid unfavorable
    altitudes and separation angles. I'm open to the possibility, but skeptical.
    > *** from "**About Lunars**" by our [very] much regretted George Huxtable who 
    was the first one actually whom I personally contacted about Lunars.
    Dear old George, gone but not forgotten.

    Browse Files

    Drop Files


    What is NavList?

    Join NavList

    (please, no nicknames or handles)
    Do you want to receive all group messages by email?
    Yes No

    You can also join by posting. Your first on-topic post automatically makes you a member.

    Posting Code

    Enter the email address associated with your NavList messages. Your posting code will be emailed to you immediately.

    Email Settings

    Posting Code:

    Custom Index

    Start date: (yyyymm dd)
    End date: (yyyymm dd)

    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site
    Visit this site